• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

School funds being spent inefficiently: survey

LONDON
Tue Sep 18, 2007 10:24am EDT
Graduating students Priscilla Martinez (L) and Rajiv Prem Chandiramani (R) take a photograph before the 2007 Seaver College commencement at Pepperdine University in Malibu, California April 28, 2007. Rich nations are spending far more on education than they did 12 years ago, but inefficient use of resources is hampering efforts to improve standards, the OECD said on Tuesday. REUTERS/Phil McCarten

LONDON (Reuters) - Rich nations are spending far more on education than they did 12 years ago, but inefficient use of resources is hampering efforts to improve standards, the OECD said on Tuesday.

Lifestyle

In its annual "Education at a Glance" survey, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) found that, by spending current resources more efficiently, learning levels could be raised by 22 percent.

"Countries are collectively spending more than they have ever done on education ... But the results gained from that investment are far from maximized," said the OECD, which represents 30 industrialized countries.

The Paris-based organization reported that just 55 percent of funding provided by the U.S. government for schools went to pay teachers, well below OECD levels of more than 63 percent.

Financing the expansion of higher education would be an issue for many countries in the future, it said. Spending per pupil had already begun to decline in some.

"Innovative financing and student support policies that mobilize extra public and private funding will be part of the answer and many countries are moving successfully in this direction...," it said.

Between 1995 and 2004, spending on education had increased by 42 percent on average in OECD countries as more people than ever completed secondary and university education, the OECD said.

However, it said the increase in education spending in that period had fallen behind growth in national income.

The report also found university graduates earned more money and found jobs more easily than people who did not have degrees and these advantages have grown over recent years in many countries.

"However, fears of a crowding-out effect, whereby more graduates would mean more unemployment at the lower end of the scale, seem not to be justified," the OECD said.

But the penalties for not finishing secondary schooling were significant, the OECD said. Students who did not finish high school had unemployment rates five to seven points higher than those who finished high school or went to university.

More than 40 percent of young people now complete university courses in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway and Poland.

In Germany and Austria, where courses are longer, only around 20 percent of young people get degrees, it said.

OECD analyst Andreas Schleicher said that countries that had invested in higher education and the "knowledge economy" had bright futures.

"What you have seen are these countries making such an improvement in their investment, they are certainly better off," he added.



More from Reuters

An image of U.S. President Barack Obama is seen in an exhibition at the Nobel Peace Centre in Oslo December 9, 2009. Two leading international human rights groups gave Obama mixed reviews on his human rights record on Wednesday, a day before he is slated to accept the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize in Oslo. Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International urged Obama to use his acceptance speech on Thursday to renew U.S. leadership on human rights after its position was undermined by abuses committed during the Bush administration's war on terrorism. REUTERS/Chris Helgren

Copenhagen: What of Obama?

President Barack Obama’s decision to attend the climate talks in Copenhagen is said to show the White House is serious about pursuing a deal to curb global warming. What should Obama commit to on climate change? Share your views.  Full Article | Related Story 

     Tom Metzold, Vice President of Eaton Vance Management and Senior Portfolio Manager at Eaton Vance, speaks at the Reuters Global Media Summit in New York, December 9, 2009. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

    "Everything's not hunky-dory"

    Did the worst downturn in 70 years leave a permanent scar? Top money managers like Tom Metzold examine how a "new normal" will shape things to come.  Full Article 

    A crown in a file photo. REUTERS/File
    Special Report:

    No longer king of the hill

    When times were good, hedge fund managers could do what they wanted and people still lined up for a piece of the action. What will the post-crash, post-Madoff, post-Galleon hedge fund universe look like?  Full Article