• Most Popular
  • Most Shared
A shopper browses the bread section at a Wal-Mart store in Santa Clarita, California April 1, 2008. REUTERS/Mario Anzuoni

The food-stamp economy

On the last day of every month, shoppers at Walmart load their carts with food and household items and wait for the midnight hour. Is this the new normal in America?  Full Article 

Rhode Island court denies same-sex divorce plea

BOSTON
Fri Dec 7, 2007 4:54pm EST

BOSTON (Reuters) - Rhode Island's top court narrowly ruled on Friday that a same-sex couple married in Massachusetts -- the only U.S. state to allow gay marriage -- could not legally divorce in Rhode Island, saying that the state's family court did not have authority over same-sex marriages.

U.S.

Massachusetts currently allows out-of-state same-sex couples from just two states -- Rhode Island and New Mexico -- to marry there, since those states' laws do not clearly prohibit gay marriage.

The 3-2 ruling came in the case of Margaret Chambers and Cassandra Ormiston, two women who married in Massachusetts in May 2004. They filed for divorce last year.

Rhode Island's attorney general had previously said the state would recognize gay marriages sealed in neighboring Massachusetts.

But the state's top court found that the 1961 Rhode Island law establishing its family court did not grant authority to issue divorces to same-sex couples.

"Words can have different meanings at different points of historical time, but it is the role of the judiciary to ascertain what meaning a particular word had when the statute containing that word was enacted," the court's ruling reads. "Our role is to interpret what was enacted and not to speculate as to what some other not-yet-enacted statute might say or mean."

Rhode Island's family court, which handles divorce cases, had asked the state supreme court whether it could handle the case.

The two dissenting judges wrote in their opinion that refusing to grant divorces to couples legally married in another state left them "in a virtual legal limbo."

Both the majority and the dissenting judges wrote that the question of the legality of gay marriage in Rhode Island would be best answered by state lawmakers.

Chris Edelson, state legislative director with the Human Rights Campaign, a gay-rights organization, said the ruling raised the question of whether Rhode Island would continue to recognize gay marriages sealed in Massachusetts.

Forty-five U.S. states have constitutional amendments or laws limiting marriage to heterosexual couples, according to the Human Rights Campaign.

More than 8,000 same-sex couples have married in Massachusetts after the state's highest court ruled in 2003 that it was unconstitutional to ban gay marriage. The first U.S. same-sex marriages took place in May the following year.

(Editing by Vicki Allen)



More from Reuters

Photo

Investors seen jumping the gun on airport security

BANGALORE (Reuters) - Investors' optimism surrounding the shares of airport security systems makers could be premature as interest in the companies' products after the Christmas Day plane scare is not expected to translate into immediate orders.

A hiring sign hangs in a window at PETCO in Falls Church, Virginia June 5, 2009.REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque

Dust off your resumes

Employers say they'll be adding headcount in the coming year. Here's where the jobs will be.  Full Article 

Tiger Woods blows on his putter on the 10th hole during final round play of the Tournament Players Championship golf tournament at the TPC at Sawgrass in Ponte Vedra, Florida May 13, 2007.

Tiger's $12 billion scandal?

Shareholders of Tiger Woods' sponsors discover that along with the upside, there are big downside risks, too, a study shows.  Full Article