• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

FACTBOX-CME wheat cash-and-carry trade example

Wed Nov 11, 2009 4:26pm EST
 Nov 11 (Reuters) - The lack of "convergence" of cash and
futures prices coming together at futures expiration in the CME
wheat contract is complicated.
 Critics say ample soft red winter wheat supplies, low
interest rates, a futures delivery system focused on the upper
U.S. Midwest and the use of the contract's delivery instruments
as an investment -- known as the "cash-and-carry" trade --
contribute to the lack of convergence.
 The following is an example of a cash-and-carry trade based
on Dec. 1, 2008, market conditions.
 Wheat Delivery Economics on Dec. 1, 2008
 CME Wheat futures prices:
 March 2009       $5.2800
 December 2008    $5.0975
                                    +18.250 cents
 Storage cost:
 16.5 hundredths
 of a cent per day for 91 days     -15.015 cents
 Profit on spread                   + 3.235 cents
 Annualized Rate of Return:
 3.235 cents/509.75 cents (profit on spread/Dec wheat cost)
 x 365/91 (days in a year/three-month storage)
 x 100 =
 2.545% (financial rate of return)
 This return is greater than LIBOR on Dec. 1, 2008: 2.22%
 Source: Scott Irwin, economist, University of Illinois
  (Reporting by Christine Stebbins)


Stocks



More from Reuters

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft is surrounded by employees and special guests during its world premiere outside the Boeing assembly plant in Everett, Washington, in this July 8, 2007 file photo. REUTERS/Robert Sorbo/Files

Dreamliner set for test flight

Boeing's fuel-efficient 787 will take off on its first test flight, nearly two and a half years behind schedule. But the hurdles aren't over.  Full Article 

Demonstrator holds a signboard with a slogan "Bla bla bla ACT NOW" during a rally outside the UN Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen, December 12, 2009. Credit: REUTERS/Christian Charisius

Rewarding polluters

A climate change scientist blasts proposals for a cap and trade system, arguing that it allows dirty industries to continue polluting, instead of rewarding innovation.  Full Article