• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Gene test for lung cancer aggressiveness sought

WASHINGTON
Sun Jul 20, 2008 1:20pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. and Canadian researchers have taken steps toward developing a gene test to determine whether a patient's lung cancer is especially aggressive, or whether radical treatment can be avoided.

U.S.  |  Health  |  Bonds  |  Global Markets

The researchers reported on Sunday that they analyzed lung cancer tissue from 442 people to confirm that measuring the activity of certain genes can help predict early on which cases may be the most deadly and which have a better prognosis.

Knowing whether a person has an aggressive tumor -- one likely to spread quickly and uncontrollably beyond the lungs -- is critical in determining the type of treatment needed.

The researchers said tracking gene activity, along with taking into account clinical factors like the patient's age, sex and the tumor stage -- for example, whether it had spread -- made them better able to make a prognosis.

Doctors are eager to come up with reliable ways to determine how aggressive a tumor is likely to be when a patient is in the earliest stages of lung cancer. Some patients have aggressive tumors that could require additional types of potentially onerous treatment, while people with less invasive tumors may be able to avoid such treatment.

"We're hoping that by looking at activity of specific genes that it would basically give us a window into the aggressiveness of it," David Beer of the University of Michigan Medical School, who helped lead the study published in the journal Nature Medicine, said in a telephone interview.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in men worldwide and the second leading cause of cancer death in women, with about 975,000 men and 376,000 women projected to die from it annually, according to the American Cancer Society.

Out of about 22,000 genes tracked in the study, Beer said the activity of "hundreds" of them was implicated in predicting the aggressiveness of a tumor.

"We're assuming that the genes that we're looking at are playing a role in the aggressive behavior of the tumors -- so their ability to invade and metastasize (spread)," he said.

Patients whose lung cancer has not spread may not need additional treatment after surgery to remove the tumor.

But if it can be shown a tumor is likely to be aggressive, the patient could be a candidate for getting further therapy that might include chemotherapy and radiation.

The goal is for a simple test assessing the activity of certain genes to determine the aggressiveness of a tumor. The researchers said they plan to refine the process, identifying critical genes and testing more tissue samples.

Beer said he is optimistic that a predictive test can be developed "relatively soon."

"We're working on it right now and so are lots of people around the world. I think within the next five years we'll definitely have something," Beer added.

The lung cancer tissue samples came from six different institutions in the United States and Canada.

The particular type of cancer involved in the study was lung adenocarcinoma, which often is caused by smoking.

(Editing by Julie Steenhuysen and Vicki Allen)



More from Reuters

Photo

GMAC to get $3.5 billion more in government aid

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - GMAC Financial Services is expected to get about $3.5 billion of additional U.S. government aid to help the troubled lender absorb mortgage losses, a financial industry source familiar with the matter said on Wednesday.

A sign informs passengers of a "High Risk of Terrorist Attack" at the departure security line at Reagan National Airport in Washington December 29, 2009.  REUTERS/Kevin Lamarque   (

Body scans are Obama's call

The Dutch are doing it. So what's taking the U.S. so long to make airport body scanners mandatory?  Full Article | Video 

People walk past a branch of Bank of America in New York's financial district April 28, 2009. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Move your money

Boycotting "too big to fail" banks is a great idea -- so long as investors remember that banks aren't the only ones responsible for the crisis.  Full Article