UPDATE 1-US FCC to examine future of Internet access
(Adds details in paragraphs 12-16)
By Rachelle Younglai
WASHINGTON, March 22 (Reuters) - The U.S. Federal Communications Commission took a small step to address a growing debate on whether high-speed Internet providers like AT&T Inc. (T.N) and Comcast Corp. (CMCSA.O) should be barred from charging extra fees to guarantee access to the Internet.
The five commissioners backed a proposal on Thursday to start a "notice of inquiry" regarding broadband industry practices.
The notice of inquiry, a fact-finding mission that does not always result in a rule being issued, grudgingly won support from the two Democrats on the Republican-controlled panel.
"I would have preferred a more proactive approach," said Democrat Jonathan Adelstein.
Fellow Democrat Michael Copps chided the commission for proceeding too leisurely and said putting out a notice of inquiry is "not the way to sail boldly forward."
"I want an FCC that unconditionally states its preference for nondiscrimination on the Internet," Copps said.
The concept of broadband providers treating all Internet content in the same way is also known as "net neutrality" and has been the subject of much debate among lawmakers.
The fear is that if broadband providers charge extra fees for more reliable service, that they would also be able to block access to the Internet -- a contention that broadband providers hotly dispute.
Republican Commissioner Robert McDowell called the initial proposal a sensible, thoughtful and reasonable step and said the commission should resist the temptation to impose regulation based merely on theory.
BROADBAND WIRELESS DEEMED INFORMATION SERVICE
The FCC also voted in favor of classifying wireless broadband as an information service, shielding it from numerous regulations.
Wireless broadband, which powers items like the data cards used in laptops to get a high-speed connection to do work on the road, will be less regulated than if it was classified as a telecommunications service.
"I have long believed that the commission should focus on creating a regulatory environment that promotes investment and competition by minimizing economic regulation," said FCC Chairman Kevin Martin at the commission's monthly meeting.
"All providers of the same service should be treated in the same manner regardless of the technology they employ," he said.
The order, which was approved with varying levels of support by the five commissioners, won praise from the wireless industry, but not from consumer groups.
"They are removing consumer protection from wireless broadband that they removed from high-speed," said Art Brodsky, a spokesman for Public Knowledge, a consumer advocacy group. "Nobody knows what the rules are in the high-speed broadband area. It's just not clear."
The agency has already classified cable modem, DSL, and broadband over power lines as information services, based on the idea that less regulation spurs deployment and innovation.
An information service includes services like voice mail, that use technology to manipulate and store information, while telecommunications is the simple transmission of information.
Information services have always been lightly regulated by the FCC, whereas telecommunication services are subject to many regulations.
((Reporting by Rachelle Younglai, editing by Tim Dobbyn; e-mail: rachelle.younglai@reuters.com; tel: 202-898-8411)) Keywords: FCC NETNEUTRALITY/
(C) Reuters 2007. All rights reserved. Republication or redistribution ofReuters content, including by caching, framing or similar means, is expresslyprohibited without the prior written consent of Reuters. Reuters and the Reuterssphere logo are registered trademarks and trademarks of the Reuters group ofcompanies around the world.nN22242197
