• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Merrill CEO's package may top $200 mln

Mon Oct 29, 2007 12:46pm EDT

Stocks

   
Merrill Lynch President and Chief Operating Officer Stan O'Neal announces an agreement with New York State Attorney General Eliot Spitzer to reform investment practices, in New York on May 21, 2002. The anticipated departure of Merrill Lynch & Co Inc Chief Executive Stan O'Neal would mark a surprising flameout in a career that had been impressive in its ascent. REUTERS/Chip East

By Tim McLaughlin

Stocks  |  Funds News

NEW YORK (Reuters) - If Merrill Lynch & Co Inc MER.N ousts Chief Executive Stan O'Neal, his company holdings, retirement benefits and severance package would easily top $200 million, U.S. regulatory filings show.

In the absence of a takeover, Merrill Lynch says it does not have severance agreements with senior executives. For O'Neal, any severance package would come at the discretion of the board's compensation committee, which includes two directors who have been strong allies.

The chairman of Merrill's five-member compensation committee is Chubb Corp (CB.N) CEO John Finnegan, a former O'Neal colleague from their days at General Motors.

Alberto Cribiore, founder of private-equity firm Brera Capital Partners, also is on the committee and has been a strong supporter of O'Neal, according to people familiar with their relationship.

O'Neal's tenure is at risk because of an $8.4 billion write-down in the third quarter, mostly because of bad bets on securities tied to risky subprime loans. As a result, O'Neal presided over the biggest quarterly loss in the company's 93-year history.

"Even if he's pushed out, the board will feel that some kind of severance would be in order," said compensation expert Arthur Kroll, chief executive of KST Consulting Group.

"There are certain things that the company will want from him in return," Kroll said. "They like to have these things done in an orderly fashion, with joint announcements and no one suing one another."

Even without a severance package, O'Neal has amassed a large sum in the form of common stock, stock options, restricted stock, incentive-based pay, pension benefits and deferred compensation, regulatory filings show.

O'Neal's stock holdings alone total about $90 million. His unexercised stock options are worth about $39.3 million and unvested restricted stock is worth about $76 million, the filings show.

Once a top executive leaves a company, vesting is typically accelerated, giving the executive ownership of the shares.

"I have the same beef with Merrill that I have with most investment banks, which is that CEOs receive bonuses for meeting short-term targets," said Paul Hodgson, a pay expert and senior researcher at corporate watchdog The Corporate Library.

Not included in those figures are unearned shares -- estimated at a maximum value of $33.9 million earlier this year by Merrill -- that have not vested and are pegged to the company's return on equity, regulatory filings show. With Merrill losing $2.3 billion in the third quarter, the value of those incentive-based shares could be hurt.

In addition, the value of O'Neal's pension benefits for 20 years of service were estimated at $12 million to $24.8 million, depending on his retirement age. He also had nearly $5 million in a deferred compensation plan at the end of last year, filings show.

(Additional reporting by Joseph Giannone and Martha Graybow in New York)



More from Reuters

Photo

Plot exposes fissure in U.S. intelligence community

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Last week's failed plot to bomb a U.S. passenger jet has exposed lingering fissures within the U.S. intelligence community, which had information from interviews and clandestine intercepts but did not put the pieces together, officials said.

Floor traders work at the Hong Kong Stocks Exchange, January 16, 2008.   REUTERS/Bobby Yip

My way or the highway?

Hong Kong is poised to accept Beijing's accounting standards. That's good. The system, though, is prone to scandal. That's bad.  Full Article 

People walk past a branch of Bank of America in New York's financial district April 28, 2009. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

Move your money

Boycotting "too big to fail" banks is a great idea -- so long as investors remember that banks aren't the only ones responsible for the crisis.  Full Article