• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

Danone loses Wahaha trademark in China arbitration

Mon Dec 10, 2007 4:42am EST

Stocks

   

SHANGHAI, Dec 10 (Reuters) - French food giant Danone (DANO.PA) said on Monday that a Chinese arbitration office has requested it to terminate its trademark transfer agreement with Chinese partner Wahaha Group.

Stocks  |  Mergers & Acquisitions

In a statement, Danone said China's Hangzhou Arbitration Commission had ruled against Danone in the case and it is "shocked" by the decision, which contradicts facts.

Danone also said it would make a statement later in a further response to the matter.

Danone and Wahaha have been exchanging accusations and lawsuits for months, with the French company accusing Wahaha of setting up illegal parallel operations outside their ventures that sell Wahaha-branded products.

Danone has asserted that it had paid Wahaha Group 50 million yuan ($6.6 million) as part of a deal that gave the joint ventures exclusive right to use the trademark, and that the transfer had been confirmed by the Hangzhou government. But on June 14, Wahaha filed an arbitration claim, seeking termination of the trademark transfer agreement signed with the joint venture in 1996. Wahaha said the venture never formally and legally transferred the trademark from Wahaha Group. (Reporting by Samuel Shen; Editing by Charlie Zhu)



More from Reuters

A glass of water taken from a residential well after the start of natural gas drilling in Dimock, Pennsylvania, March 7, 2009. Dimock is one of hundreds of sites in Pennsylvania where energy companies are now racing to tap the massive Marcellus Shale natural gas formation. REUTERS/Tim Shaffer

Not in my watershed: NYC

The biggest U.S. city wants the state to ban one of the most promising sources of U.S. energy -- and also one of the most contentious.  Full Article 

Cannabis sativa plant is seen in Buenos Aires, August 21, 2009. REUTERS/Enrique Marcarian
Bernd Debusmann:

Obama, drugs, common sense

American attitudes towards drug prohibition – and above all, punitive laws on marijuana – are changing too fast for policymakers and legislators to ignore.  Commentary