- Quake-hit New Zealand city remains shut | Video
- God did not create the universe, says Hawking
- Firm can't fire man for 1.8 cent theft
- German party mistakenly hands out porn pens to kids
- As temperatures soar, Japanese turn to ghost houses
- Motorcycling-Japan's Tomizawa dies after crash - Italian TV
- Steve Jobs: iTunes 10 Icon Does Not 'Suck'
- IMF's Lipsky says moderate world recovery underway
- Islamist threat to Germany is growing say police
- Obama to propose permanent research tax credit
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
Economy weighs on midterms
Tough economic times and aggressive campaigning by the Republicans weigh heavy on President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Follow Reuters for complete analysis, opinion and polls ahead of the November midterm elections. Full Coverage
Airport scanner radiation risk low, agencies say
VIENNA |
VIENNA (Reuters) - New full-body airport security scanners using X-rays generate much lower doses than normal background radiation, a draft report compiled by international agencies says.
Such devices, which cost about 10 times as much as conventional airport scanners, are likely to go into much wider use since a Nigerian man with explosives hidden undetected in his underwear boarded a U.S. airplane heading to Detroit on December 25.
While normal annual background radiation per person runs to about 3,000 microsieverts -- a unit used to measure radiation exposure -- the body scan delivers 0.1 to 5 microsevierts, the report, compiled by a group of international bodies including the European Commission and the U.N. nuclear agency said.
"This (risk) is very small," Renate Czarwinski, head of radiation safety and monitoring at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) in Vienna, told Reuters Friday.
"Every application of X-ray systems should be justified...you have to weigh the benefits and the probable harm. The benefit, for security, is very high," she said.
There are two types of full-body scanner -- one which uses high frequency radio waves and one using X-rays -- and only the latter machine would expose passengers to the ionizing radiation such as that used in medical X-rays, Czarwinski said.
Although the dosages are small, the inter-agency report said exposures should be carefully monitored.
"In order to appropriately assess the full radiological protection impact of scanner use, the manner in which passengers will be selected should be known," it said.
The scanners, used to see under clothes and identify unusual objects, may have detected the hidden explosives the Nigerian is alleged to have carried on board the jetliner but their use has been limited mainly because of cost and privacy concerns.
(Reporting by Sylvia Westall; Editing by Michael Roddy)







