Inside Toyota's epic breakdown
An inside look at the spectacular crisis embroiling one of the world's best-known brands shows a series of unheeded warnings and a stubborn refusal to listen. Full Article | Video
China PLA officers urge economic punch against U.S.
BEIJING (Reuters) - Senior Chinese military officers have proposed that their country boost defense spending, adjust PLA deployments, and possibly sell some U.S. bonds to punish Washington for its latest round of arms sales to Taiwan.
The calls for broad retaliation over the planned U.S. weapons sales to the disputed island came from officers at China's National Defence University and Academy of Military Sciences, interviewed by Outlook Weekly, a Chinese-language magazine published by the official Xinhua news agency.
The interviews with Major Generals Zhu Chenghu and Luo Yuan and Senior Colonel Ke Chunqiao appeared in the issue published on Monday.
The People's Liberation Army (PLA) plays no role in setting policy for China's foreign exchange holdings. Officials in charge of that area have given no sign of any moves to sell U.S. Treasury bonds over the weapons sales, a move that could alarm markets and damage the value of China's own holdings.
While far from representing fixed government policy, the open demands for retaliation by the PLA officers underscored the domestic pressures on Beijing to deliver on its threats to punish the Obama administration over the arms sales.
"Our retaliation should not be restricted to merely military matters, and we should adopt a strategic package of counter-punches covering politics, military affairs, diplomacy and economics to treat both the symptoms and root cause of this disease," said Luo Yuan, a researcher at the Academy of Military Sciences.
"Just like two people rowing a boat, if the United States first throws the strokes into chaos, then so must we."
Luo said Beijing could "attack by oblique means and stealthy feints" to make its point in Washington.
"For example, we could sanction them using economic means, such as dumping some U.S. government bonds," Luo said.
The warnings from the PLA come after weeks of strains between Washington and Beijing, who have also been at odds over Internet controls and hacking, trade and currency quarrels, and President Barack Obama's planned meeting with the Dalai Lama, the exiled Tibetan leader reviled by China as a "separatist."
MILITARY SPENDING BOOST
Chinese has blasted the United States over the planned $6.4 billion arms package for Taiwan unveiled in late January, saying it will sanction U.S. firms that sell weapons to the self-ruled island that Beijing considers a breakaway province of China.
China is likely to unveil its official military budget for 2010 next month, when the Communist Party-controlled national parliament meets for its annual session.
The PLA officers suggested that budget should mirror China's ire toward Washington.
"Clearly propose that due to the threat in the Taiwan Sea, we are increasing military spending," said Luo.
Last year, the government set the official military budget at 480.7 billion yuan ($70.4 billion), a 14.9 percent rise on the one in 2008, continuing a nearly unbroken succession of double-digit increases over more than two decades.
The fresh U.S. arms sales threatened Chinese military installations on the mainland coast facing Taiwan, and "this gives us no choice but to increase defense spending and adjust (military) deployments," said Zhu Chenghu, a major general at China's National Defence University in Beijing.
In 2005, Zhu stirred controversy by suggesting China could use nuclear weapons if the United States intervened militarily in a conflict over Taiwan.
The United States switched official recognition from Taiwan to China in 1979. But the Taiwan Relations Act, passed the same year, guarantees Taiwan a continued supply of defensive weapons.
China has the world's biggest pile of foreign currency reserves, much of it held in U.S. treasury debt. China held $798.9 billion in U.S. Treasuries at end-October.
But any attempt to use that stake against Washington would probably maul the value of China's own dollar-denominated assets.
China has condemned previous arms sales, but has taken little action in response to them. But Luo said the country's growing strength meant that time has passed.
"China's attitude and actions over U.S. weapons sales to Taiwan will be increasingly tough," the magazine cited him as saying. "That is inevitable with rising national strength."
(Editing by Jeremy Laurence)
PLEASE DO IT! We really don’t need our future tied together with the Chinese Communists, who undermine us at every turn. You are doing us a favor by doing so! We need to get our own house in order! Let’s up the ante and sell nukes to Taiwan!
Go Obama!!! Keep up the weak stance, I’m sure the they’ll take pity on you eventually! Haha running the U.S. isn’t quite as easy as your grandiose campaign speeches made it out to be eh?
New era of diplomacy,…. what happend Mr Obama? It appears the communists and dictators alike are in high gear while you lecture us on universal health care and plunge our nation further into debt.
I would welcome Bush back with open arms after the last 13 miserable, uninspiring, months.
nope our president doesnt give a darn all he cares about is that he was the president that passed the HCare bill and b rought socialism to the usllll
This action would cause world markets to react and the ‘quid pro quo’ would be to start tariffs and banning of China’s products in the US which would cause their markets to crash along with the rest of the world. Shows just how dangerous their military actually can be if given the decision-making authority in China. It also shows the dangerous game Obama plays by running up a defict in our country.
I buy product from China by the container load. I will stop and buy from India if they pull this stunt….What goes around comes around…
I hope they do it… if we had any balls we would just announce that we are not going to make payments on any US bonds, like the South American countries did in the not so long ago past.
Then we would force the US government to live on a budget of what they have not what the politicians want.












