• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.

President Barack Obama attends a Democratic Party fundraising event in Chicago, August 5, 2010. REUTERS/Jason Reed

Economy weighs on midterms

Tough economic times and aggressive campaigning by the Republicans weigh heavy on President Barack Obama and the Democratic Party. Follow Reuters for complete analysis, opinion and polls ahead of the November midterm elections.  Full Coverage 

    Fed renews "extended period" low-rate vow

    Factbox

    Related Video

    Trader Richard Smartt reacts in the Euro Dollar pit at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, March 16, 2010. REUTERS/John Gress

    Trader Richard Smartt reacts in the Euro Dollar pit at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, March 16, 2010.

    Credit: Reuters/John Gress

    WASHINGTON | Tue Mar 16, 2010 7:46pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve renewed its pledge on Tuesday to keep interest rates near zero for an "extended period" even as it sounded more upbeat about jobs.

    The central bank's nod to a firmer job market after the deepest recession in decades offered a hint it may be moving closer to dropping its promise to hold borrowing costs at rock bottom levels.

    However, it reintroduced a note of caution about the housing sector and repeated its view the economy's recovery would likely be moderate for a time. It also said inflation was likely to remain subdued as it held interbank overnight rates in a zero to 0.25 percent range.

    Following the decision, most big banks that deal directly with the Fed forecast a rate hike by year end, likely in the fourth quarter.

    "The (Fed's policy) committee ... continues to anticipate that economic conditions, including low rates of resource utilization, subdued inflation trends, and stable inflation expectations, are likely to warrant exceptionally low levels of the federal funds rate for an extended period," the central bank said in a statement.

    U.S. stocks added to gains after the decision, while the dollar slipped against the euro and yen, and prices for U.S. government bonds rose. The Dow Jones industrial average and the large-cap Standard & Poor's 500 Index closed at multi-month highs.

    "The statement suggests that the doves still have the upper hand," said Paul Dales, an economist for Capital Economics in Toronto. "Admittedly, the tone was more upbeat...but the usual caution is still evident."

    For a second consecutive meeting, Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank President Thomas Hoenig dissented, saying the commitment to keep rates exceptionally low for an extended period was no longer warranted.

    The Fed said the labor market was "stabilizing," a more optimistic view than expressed after its last meeting in late January, when the policy-setting committee said only that deterioration in the labor market was "abating."

    The central bank also said business spending on equipment and software had risen "significantly," also a brighter assessment than the one offered in January.

    The central bank reiterated that it intends to wrap up purchases of mortgage-related assets by the end of March, but said it would monitor the economic outlook and financial developments to see if more support is necessary.

    As those purchases come to a close, officials voiced heightened concern about the very sector they were meant to assist, saying that new homebuilding activity was "flat at a depressed level."

    Interest rates futures markets pared back the implied prospects that the Fed would raise the federal funds rate to 0.5 percent by its meeting in early November to 76 percent from 87 percent before the central bank's decision was announced.

    "On the whole, there is nothing that will accelerate or decelerate toward a monetary tightening very late this year," said Jason Pride, director of investment strategy at wealth management firm Glenmede in Philadelphia.

    NOT YET PUSHING EXIT DOOR OPEN

    The Fed has held the benchmark federal funds rate near zero since December 2008 to bolster the economy and help it through the most severe financial crisis in generations. Last March, it committed to holding rates very low for "an extended period."

    The economy resumed growth in the second half of last year, and expanded at a robust 5.9 percent annual clip in the final three months of 2009.

    Although the unemployment rate held at a lofty 9.7 percent in February as the economy shed 36,000 jobs, some of the lost jobs were pinned on blizzards that hit much of the nation. Many economists expect payroll growth as early as March.

    Gains in manufacturing activity and retail sales have added to evidence the recovery is gaining traction.

    The Fed has allowed special lending facilities to close as financial markets have returned to normal after the crisis, and it recently raised the discount rate it charges banks for emergency loans to 0.75 percent from 0.5 percent.

    Fed officials stressed the move was in keeping with the settling of financial markets and was not a precursor to efforts to tighten lending conditions.

    However, policymakers have begun to spell out steps they anticipate taking to move away from their easy money policies when the recovery gains steam. Officials say the Fed would likely start by pulling back some of more than $1 trillion it pumped into the economy during the crisis before it begins raising rates.

    (Additional reporting by David Lawder, Emily Kaiser and Glenn Somerville; Editing by Andrew Hay)

    Comments

    Mar 16, 2010 1:12am EDT

    So banks can take money from the Fed at around 0%, lend it out at around 10%, which due to fractional reserve lending ends up being more than 100%, and they still couldn’t turn a profit?
    They have huge super computers with almost unlimited processing power at their finger tips and mainframes tracking just about every transaction happening on Earth and yet we’re meant to believe they couldn’t see the financial crisis coming?
    Can incompetence of that magnitude really exist? I find that very hard to believe.
    I’m guessing everything is happening exactly how someone has planned it. Surely?

    RandomName Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 5:20am EDT

    So everyone else in the country gets to go through the “New Depression” except the banks? Why should we insulate them so well and no one else? They create nothing. They have become a caner on our society. Banks used to give me a toaster to open a savings account at 4% or better. Now they charge me just to have my own money. They must be stopped.
    Campaign finance reform and term limits are the ONLY things that will change anything. We must break the power bases.

    tmc Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 5:23am EDT

    So banks can pay savers next to nothing in interest and yet still pay out billions in bonuses, boy aren’t all of us with money in the banks suckers!

    minipaws Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 6:03am EDT

    End the Fed right now.

    At least insist your representatives pass S604 transparency act ad HR1207 has already been passed. CALL YOUR REPS NOW about S604! AUDIT THE FED!

    TheMarketTruth Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 7:35am EDT

    I see story-bum is still spamming this place. No one wants to see your porno website.

    zxcvb Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 9:34am EDT

    We are pretty much giving banks an interest free loan. This was expected, easy to manipulate the system when banks are given money but in turn make it next to impossible to lend it out even for people that have jobs. As a result, the market forces the FED to keep interest rates low. When I was not able to renegotiate my loan in July, I thought okay ARM or not what is going to change? I cannot be the only in this situation. Who benefits? The banks…

    FED should consider giving money to the banks with a criteria for minimum transactions (loans) to be executed loan within a reasonable period of time.

    dalvrl Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 9:40am EDT

    If indeed inflation takes off (and I wish people would stop talking us into it) then increasing interest rates will only compound the problem. In the past hiking up interest rates was used to control inflation. It was said that ‘this blunt instrument’ removed heat (inflationary causes) from the economy, similar condition do not exist, so what exactly will it achieve? Can anyone truthfully say what might cause this much predicted inflation. Perhaps there in lies the cure?

    tbink Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 3:33pm EDT

    RandomName – Your “guess” would be correct.

    Miltdog Report As Abusive
     
     
    Mar 16, 2010 3:58pm EDT

    End the fed? How ignorant.

    MarkPharaoh Report As Abusive
     
     
    This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

     

     
    *We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.