- India leads calls for action to stop Koran burning | Video
- B vitamins found to halve brain shrinkage in old
- Fidel Castro says Cuban model no longer works
- Economists cut U.S. growth forecast again
- Obama firm against tax cuts for rich
- Firm can't fire man for 1.8 cent theft
- Former singer with boy band LFO dies of leukemia
- Pressure mounts in U.S. against Koran-burning plan | Video
- Obama: U.S. can't afford to extend tax cuts for rich | Video
- Health reforms trigger spending shift
NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.
Leaders and losers
Which companies win and who loses out for their impact on the environment this month? ASSET4 brings you this rundown of winners and losers in green business headlines. Full Article
BP to try well kill Tuesday
Part of the containment capping stack is pictured in this image captured from a BP live video feed from the Gulf of Mexico during integrity testing July 30, 2010.
Credit: Reuters/BP/Handout
BILOXI, Mississippi |
BILOXI, Mississippi (Reuters) - BP said on Friday it could seal its ruptured Gulf of Mexico oil well by next week as the House of Representatives voted to toughen regulation of offshore energy drilling.
Incoming BP Chief Executive Bob Dudley said the British energy giant would attempt a "static kill" operation on Tuesday to try to plug the blown-out deep-sea well that caused the worst offshore oil spill in U.S. history.
This marks a slight delay. The U.S. official overseeing the spill response, retired Coast Guard Admiral Thad Allen, had said on Thursday he hoped the operation to pump mud and cement into the well could be performed as early as this weekend.
As BP moved ahead with its plans, U.S. government scientists said South Florida, the Florida Keys and the U.S. East Coast likely will be spared from oil pollution from the spill despite earlier dire warnings.
The House, by a vote of 209-193, passed reforms to offshore drilling practices in response to the spill, which caused an economic and environmental disaster along the U.S. Gulf Coast. President Barack Obama supports the bill.
Gulf Coast Democrats secured an amendment to the legislation to end Obama's moratorium on deepwater drilling for oil companies that meet new federal safety requirements. The current moratorium runs through the end of November.
By the time the full Congress completes action on the offshore drilling bill -- and it is uncertain that it will -- it could be November or later. The Senate has not yet acted on its version of the legislation.
Obama's fellow Democrats in the House rejected Republican warnings that the bill would slash U.S. oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico, a major supplier of domestic energy, and cut high-paying drilling jobs.
The "static kill" process will involve pumping drilling mud and cement into the well from the top to plug it. A relief well is intended to intersect the ruptured well deep under the seabed to allow mud and cement to be pumped from the bottom to provide a permanent fix.
No new oil has leaked since BP installed a tight-fitting containment cap atop the well on July 15 as a temporary fix.
"We want to absolutely kill this well. The static kill will be attempted on Tuesday. The relief well by the end of the month (August)," said Dudley, BP's top executive on the Gulf oil spill who will replace Tony Hayward as CEO on October 1.
At a briefing on Friday, Allen said "static kill" would be delayed until Tuesday to clean out debris and sediment found in the relief well, which has bored deep into the earth and is intended to plug the leak from the bottom.
Once cleaned out, BP can finish cementing the pipe into the relief well and move forward with a static kill, Allen said.
In his first news conference on the Gulf since being named to replace the much-criticized Hayward, Dudley stressed BP's commitment to restoring the coast.
"We are scaling back the number of vessels offshore but we are not stopping cleanup operations by any means," he said. "We are not complacent about this at all."
Millions of gallons (liters) of oil have poured into the Gulf since April, when a rig exploded and sank, killing 11 workers and triggering the leak from the BP-owned well.
Officials have expressed cautious optimism the oil already spilled into the ocean is dissipating. The spill has hurt the livelihoods of fishermen and other business owners along the Gulf Coast and presented a challenge to BP and to Obama.
HOUSE PASSAGE
The legislation passed by the House would eliminate the current $75 million liability cap for offshore operations. It also would prohibit oil companies with poor safety records from bidding for new offshore drilling leases, effectively barring BP from starting new U.S. offshore operations.
The measure would impose tighter requirements for well design and well cementing for offshore projects and on equipment known as blowout preventers intended to prevent well ruptures like the one that occurred at BP's well in April.
The Senate is considering a similar bill, but senators are unlikely to pass it before their summer recess on August 6. If the Senate passes a bill, the two chambers would have to resolve any differences between their versions and pass a compromise one before Obama could sign it into law.
Democrats said the bill would make offshore drilling safer for workers and protect the environment from future spills.
"If you want to apologize for Big Oil, go right ahead, but the American people are not on your side on this one," Democratic Representative Jim McGovern told his Republican colleagues.
Scientists had issued dire warnings that oil from the spill would float into the loop current in the gulf and ride the powerful Gulf Stream current around the fragile islands at the southern tip of Florida and up the Atlantic Coast as far as North Carolina. But the U.S. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that was now unlikely.
The oil that remains in the Gulf is hundreds of miles (km) from the loop current. That oil is in the process of breaking down and will not travel far, NOAA said.
(Additional reporting by Richard Cowan and Tom Doggett in Washington, Matthew Bigg in Atlanta and Kristen Hays in Houston; Writing by Ed Stoddard; Editing by Will Dunham.)
i am amazed that US is not using its vast potential in producing solar energy – your country meets all the requirements – free land, sunshine hours/per day and intensity, you have the financial and human resources, the energy produced in south can be transported to the north .. though it’s looks like there is some kind of problem between the chair and the keyboard/phone
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9P1oLnKh_XE&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMnx5tFrDDc&feature=related
The oil has been stopped from leaking so let them take their time to get the permanent plug seal 100% right. It’s the “can do” quickly attitude that has caused the problem in the first place.
However I can’t help agreeing with smile4me, take a look sometime at the amount of electricity that is being produced in Spain, where I live, by a combination of solar and wind power.
Huge tracts of California, Arizona, Texas etc have very similiar climates and the amounts already procued there could be expanded many many times.
It makes sense to everyone BUT the oil companies.
I would word it even more strongly than Memo. The DH is no longer gushing (although with static kill attempt may have to “refudiate” that), but there are still leaks at some of the connections. Not to mention that the oil plus dispersant is now further below the surface, not magically disappeared. Especially for a news service, I think this piece is irresponsible and certainly incomplete. No mention of the kill bores/relief wells, huh? kait
why isn’t there any updated information
on whether the oil keeps still flowing or not?I see no pictures any further.
Are they concealing data?
Bp is broke, it will have no money for the due legal proceedings,neither for its
heavily unorganized and undermanned clean-up efforts
So does this “static kill” method call for the Snuggle bear to go down to the cap, go up and down on the cap, and everything will be fine?
Alkan here:
The Bullhead Kill will pump heavy mud followed by cement down the hole.
The heavy mud will seal any open part of the hole with mud that is heavy enough to overcome any formation pressure.
It will go into the annulus between pipe and formation in case there are any leaks or places it can squeeze into — like where the cement job is poor and an open pathway is there that could possibly create a dangerous leak. The engineers know this.
The heavy mud will sit there for millions of years to assure there is no leak anywhere. Its pressure already killed the well and all open dangerous places.
Then the cement will follow it down the pipe during this “top kill” to set up and prevent any possible further leak and hold the heavy mud down. I will be thousands of feet of cement and nothing can get by just a few feet of cement even with extremely high pressure below it.
What the static kill will do during this top kill or bullhead kill through the new cap — is to be a perfect and permanent kill of the well. You could bet a billion to one the problem is over.
The only problem left after this bullhead kill — as I see it — is that then after the well is permanently killed for millions and millions of years, they NOW propose to back this up with another hole into the Monster Formation that blew out.
This is the relief well. What will it do? I will reopen the formation with a path to the surface through its hole. I think there is a 90% or better chance it will not blow out and reopen the leak.
What will it accomplish? The answer is that with every crevice of open space filled with heavy mud and capped by thousands of feet of permanent cement, that there can be NO possible unsealed place for it to pump into anything dangerous.
It can’t pump upward (as every crevice has already been killed and sealed by the heavy mud and cement of the top kill.
It can only pump sideways and down into the rock formation like a procedure called an “oil well fracturing procedure” to open up the monster formation more and potentially create trouble if that monster blows out through the relief well.
Why then use this relief well?
The answer is because its there and PRIDE. Both the government and BP want a “double kill” (which as explained already is unnecessary). What has been permanently killed is killed. The pride thing is like killing a spider that bit you, then stomping your foot on it and pounding it over and over and over for minutes — just because it bit you. It is like hitting the wall with your fist because you got a splinter from the wall.
It is a bull seeing red — or merely human emotion that is uncontrolled and possibly violent. It is nothing logical.
What does common sense dictate?
Once it is killed — it is killed. Don’t potentially hurt yourself because your stupid pride must be satisfied.
My question is once the static kill is a total success — why hurt yourself?
Bob Dudley had better get it right. His precedesor was sent to Siberia… ;^)
– a cool site; Balkingpoints ; incredible satellite view of earth










