• Most Popular
  • Most Shared
Report Title Price
Provider: ValuEngine, Inc.
$99.0
Provider: ValuEngine, Inc.
$49.0
Provider: Market Edge
$10.0
Provider: Stock Traders Daily
$18.0
Provider: Pechala's Reports
$25.0

NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.

Wall Street marks best month in a year in July

Stocks

   

Related Video

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange July 28, 2010. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid

A trader works on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange July 28, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Brendan McDermid

NEW YORK | Fri Jul 30, 2010 4:45pm EDT

NEW YORK (Reuters) - U.S. stocks closed little changed on Friday, but Wall Street wrapped up its best month in a year after the earnings season rounded the final turn with a group of strong results that offset the impact of poor economic data.

While the major indexes each posted 7 percent gains for the month, it came during low volume and followed a combined decline of nearly 14 percent for May and June.

The conflict between strong earnings and lackluster economic news has held stocks in a tight range throughout July. Prior to Friday's open, second-quarter GDP data disappointed investors, even though shares came back later in the session.

A lack of clear direction has led to more technical trading, with the S&P 500 finding support around 1,100 while struggling to move above its 200-day moving average around 1,115. A sustained move above that level would be bullish for investors.

"We have failed up here essentially about three times, so technically people are using that as something to lean on the short side," said Nick Kalivas, vice president of financial research and senior equity index analyst at MF Global.

Kalivas said global purchasing managers' indexes at the start of next week will give investors a better idea about the direction of the economy and could be a catalyst for markets.

"The market kind of stalled up the last couple of days. On the surface earnings numbers have been pretty strong, but underneath there was a loss of momentum," he said.

Speculators are net short the S&P 500, according to Commodity Futures Trading Commission data but trimmed their short portions from a week earlier.

For July the Dow rose 7.1 percent, the S&P 500 gained 6.9 percent and the Nasdaq added 6.9 percent.

The Dow Jones industrial average .DJI dropped 1.22 points, or 0.01 percent, to 10,465.94. The Standard & Poor's 500 Index .SPX gained 0.05 points, or 0.00 percent, to 1,101.58. The Nasdaq Composite Index .IXIC gained 3.01 points, or 0.13 percent, to 2,254.70.

For the week, the Dow rose 0.4 percent, the S&P 500 lost 0.1 percent and the Nasdaq dipped 0.7 percent.

In corporate news, Chevron Corp (CVX.N), the second-largest U.S. oil company, reported a three-fold jump in quarterly profit, topping Wall Street's forecast, but its revenue was below analysts' estimate. The shares rose 0.2 percent at $76.21.

U.S. drugmaker Merck & Co (MRK.N) reported a profit that beat analysts' estimates, but its sales were less than Wall Street's expectations, and the stock fell 1.7 percent to $34.46.

In the Commerce Department's first estimate of economic growth for the second quarter, U.S. GDP expanded at a 2.4 percent annual rate, driven by capital investment, but the expansion was down from the first quarter's revised 3.7 percent rise.

U.S. consumer sentiment plunged in July to its lowest level since November on bleak prospects for jobs and income a year since the economic recovery began, according to the Thomson Reuters/University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers.

The Institute for Supply Management-Chicago business barometer, however, showed businesses boosted employment and orders.

About 7.63 billion shares traded on the New York Stock Exchange, the American Stock Exchange and Nasdaq, short of last year's estimated daily average of 9.65 billion.

Advancing stocks outnumbered declining ones on the NYSE by a ratio of about 3 to 2, while on the Nasdaq, about five stocks rose for every four that fell.

(Reporting by Edward Krudy; Editing by Kenneth Barry)

Comments

Jul 30, 2010 7:48am EDT

Who cares about April, May and June when we are almost in August?

STORYBURN17 Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 8:59am EDT

Here we go again. Imports up because businesses are readying themselves for the pick up (positive), growth is over 2% (positive), Europe’s output is up (positive) and the Euro has stabilised (positive).

But investors and traders still can’t see beyond ends of their wet little noses so stocks are down.

Ah for the Wizard of Logic to tap their little heads with his magic wand!

Hewson Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 10:39am EDT

Hewson: Right on! Time for some optimism for a change. But don’t wait for Reuters or Bloomberg or any of these other media outfits to start playing up the positives any time soon. These guys still go with ‘If it bleeds, it leads’ and there’s no evidence that attitude has changed one whit.

Gotthardbahn Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 11:19am EDT

Lifted by data? Nonens, lifted by Goldman, JP and other friends of Wall Street.

foreigner Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 3:23pm EDT

Hewson & Gotthardbahn,

Optimism is very nice indeed, but reality is more powerful in the long run.
Besides, we tried optimism (’green shoots’ – remember?) and what we got was an L shaped recovery, or in other words – no recovery in real terms.
2% growth on an annual basis after such a serious recession and tremendous efforts from the Gov and Fed is the equivalent of a monumental failure. You’d need at least twice as much to get things going again, and thereby a chance for the US to repay its increasing debt.
2% is pretty much the annual growth rate in the US population, which means that at this rate unemployment will never go down.
It’s likely to assume that coming November will be particularly gloomy for the party in power.

yr2009 Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 6:45pm EDT

So very few of you understand economics. You do realize that 2% growth rate is very low, in fact it was called a recession when Bush was president. We went from 3.7% to 2.4% in the second quarter and many economist are predicting a double dip recession. Quit listening to the spin and do a bit of research.

Trooth Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 31, 2010 5:28am EDT

The surge in business spending was large enough to dramatically increase our country’s imports.

It’s too bad that those shiploads of items had to be imported. If those items were produced in America, it would have helped our job situation which would have helped the consumer get into a position where they could spend more.

That situation represents a fundamental problem that is preventing an American economic recovery.

I suspect that a large percentage of the imported items are represented in the sales figures and profits of American companies, but workers overseas are getting the benefit of producing them.

That needs to change if we want to see an increase in domestic consumer spending. We must find a way to bring those jobs home where they belong.

breezinthru Report As Abusive
 
 
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

 

 
*We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.