• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.

Graduates from the law school hold up gavels in celebration during their commencement at Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts May 27, 2010. REUTERS/Adam Hunger

Leaders and losers

Which companies win and who loses out for their impact on the environment this month? ASSET4 brings you this rundown of winners and losers in green business headlines.  Full Article 

House approves oil spill reform bill

Factbox

Drill ships and response vessels work in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast line while attempting to drill relief wells at the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill wellhead July 27, 2010. REUTERS/Sean Gardner

Drill ships and response vessels work in the Gulf of Mexico off the Louisiana coast line while attempting to drill relief wells at the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill wellhead July 27, 2010.

Credit: Reuters/Sean Gardner

WASHINGTON | Fri Jul 30, 2010 7:16pm EDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The House of Representatives on Friday approved the toughest reforms ever to offshore energy drilling practices, as Democrats narrowly pushed through an election-year response to BP's massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.

Passing the bill as the House leaves for its six-week recess gives lawmakers the opportunity to return home boasting they reined in Big Oil and held BP responsible for the worst offshore oil disaster in U.S. history.

The vote was 209-193 on the bill supported by President Barack Obama.

But first, Gulf Coast Democrats won an amendment ending the federal moratorium on deepwater drilling for oil companies that met new safety requirements.

The Obama administration's moratorium would end in November. By the time the full Congress completes action on this offshore drilling bill -- and it is uncertain that it will -- it could be November or later.

A similar offshore drilling bill is pending in the Senate, without the House's new provision to end the drilling moratorium. But it was unlikely that measure would pass before that chamber begins its summer recess on August 6.

House Republicans warned the bill would slash U.S. oil and gas production in the Gulf of Mexico, a major supplier of domestic energy, and cut high-paying drilling jobs.

"The Obama moratorium on deepwater drilling has already costs thousands of jobs and this bill will eliminate even more American energy jobs, making it harder and more expensive to produce both energy on and offshore," said Republican Representative Pete Sessions.

"It will drive American companies out of the Gulf," said Republican Representative Kevin Brady. "This is a choice between American energy workers and foreign oil."

Democrats said the bill would make offshore drilling safer for workers, while also protecting the environment and Gulf Coast business from future oil spills like the one caused by BP that damaged wetlands and hurt the region's fishing and tourism industries.

"This legislation is about safety, about establishing new safety standards, safety for the workers on the rigs," said House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

"If you want to apologize for Big Oil, go right ahead, but the American people are not on your side on this one," Democratic Representative Jim McGovern told his Republican colleagues during a long day of debate.

Before passing the bill, the House also approved an amendment to help smaller oil companies compete for Gulf of Mexico drilling projects under the proposed reforms. The amendment would let them pool their resources in demonstrating they have the financial resources to deal with potential oil spills.

The House vote on the bill was close, as several Democrats representing districts with strong oil industry interests joined Republicans in opposition.

Representative Gene Green, from the oil industry-dominated city of Houston, was one of those Democrats. "There are a lot of things in there that have nothing to do with safety" of offshore drilling operations, Green told reporters.

A sticking point in the Senate is opposition from Republicans and some moderate Democrats to removing all liability limits oil companies would face for economic damages stemming from the BP disaster and any future spills.

Current law requires companies to only cover up to $75 million for damages to local economies. The BP spill could end up costing billions of dollars in lost tourism, fishing and other Gulf Coast revenues.

BP has said it would pay for all costs related to the spill, but many lawmakers worry that the company could put victims through years of litigation.

The Senate energy bill has an added component: new incentives to encourage more natural gas-powered trucks and electric vehicles to clean up the environment. It also provides $5 billion to help improve home energy efficiency.

But Senate Democrats abandoned attempts to attach climate change provisions that would have set mandatory limits on some companies' carbon dioxide emissions.

Senate leaders plan to hold a test vote next Wednesday to gauge support for the bill, according to a Democratic aide. But Republicans, and possibly some moderate Democrats, might block a full debate, forcing senators to take it up in September.

The House also approved a separate bill on Friday to give whistle-blower protection to workers who report violations in offshore drilling rules.

(Editing by Lisa Shumaker and Sofina Mirza-Reid)

Comments

Jul 30, 2010 7:47am EDT

Here is congress doing everything it can to focus on anything but JOBS

STORYBURN17 Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 8:52am EDT

Be careful that the senate does not shoot itself in the foot.All the big oil companies have had disasters,and now they want to change the rules because its not one of their own These companies will just uplift their rigs and go elsewhere,they cannot afford millions of dollars a day just to sit idle.America like the rest of the world needs oil, renewable energy is still a long way off

Caroniaboy Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 12:14pm EDT

Is this government trying to eliminate all non-government and non-union jobs?

MKDADDY Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 3:10pm EDT

House vote seen close on oil spill bill?

I think you meant; House vote seen [as] close on oil spill bill.

Seems like I see at least one mistake in every Reuters article lately. I’d be really annoyed to find out your editor makes a 6 figure salary because he really isn’t worth it.

GendoIkari Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 5:40pm EDT

All this bill has to do to ensure safe and virtually risk free drilling is to not only allow but force the companies to drill in depths of less that 500 feet. They want to do so now but the environmentlists won’t let them Since the Democrat party is owned and controlled by the green lobby you can bet there is no such rule in this bill. Once again,politics trupms what is best for America. Democrats live in the pocket of the Environmentalist groups and green corporations and they will do what the “Massah” commands.

Watermoon Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 8:01pm EDT

This simply MUST be a news site with a VERY conservative following as all I EVER seem to read on here are comments bashing the president, Speaker Pelosi, Leader Reid, and the rest of our nation’s leaders. I have to laugh how everyone on here seems to ALWAYS defend big businesses and now people above are attacking environmental groups who, THANK GOODNESS, keep an eye on greedy corporate America and prevent the rape and pillaging of our nation’s resources and natural beauty, not to mention its people. One day, I hope all of the above commentators get a clue and realize REPUBLICAN= FOR BIG BUSINESS DEMOCRATS= FOR THE WORKING MAN – I’m a historian, and recommend you check your history books for the last, at LEAST, forty-five to fifty years.

Scottie5356 Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 11:55pm EDT

I am up in NJ and I feel that BP hurt my feelings…do I get money? Can all the people hired by BP to fix this problem be sued as accessories? If Bush was responsible for 9/11 doesn’t this make Obama responsible for BPGate? This is democrats at their best shaking down everyone during crisis! Obama, Pelosi and Reid should really damage the USA as they act like traitors. I will bet anyone 5 years from now there will not be one trace of this spill. It is awful and shouldn’t have happened and a lot has been learned, but this is becoming one big scam!

venturen Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 30, 2010 11:57pm EDT

To Scottie5356 maybe you are just a fool and the other people are more intelligent than you. Just because you are a history professor doesn’t make you smart. Come back in 10 years when the real wreckage fro the democrats are fact. Wasn’t it the democrats who wanted slavery…remember that from your history??

venturen Report As Abusive
 
 
Jul 31, 2010 3:10am EDT

To Venturen: Yes, that is true, but after Goldwater and the election of 1964, the parties ideologies and affiliations largely switched in the south. The Republicans are no longer the party of Lincoln- they have become the party of Bush, Cheney, Limbaugh, Palin, Angle, and the rest of them. If those are the leaders you believe in, good luck to you. As far as what everyone else on here has to say- that’s just my point- go check out some other websites and get some variety! Not EVERY news site results in blog posts like the largely conservative ones on here. I only read these to give me a more diversified view point and look at all opinions of an issue- you ought to try breaking out of the box and doing the same!

Scottie5356 Report As Abusive
 
 
This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

 

 
*We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.