• Most Popular
  • Most Shared

NYSE and AMEX quotes delayed by at least 20 minutes. NASDAQ delayed by at least 15 minutes. For a complete list of exchanges and delays, please click here.

President Obama speaks about the economy near Cleveland.   REUTERS/Larry Downing

Follow Reuters for complete analysis, opinion and polls ahead of the November midterm elections.  Full Coverage 

    Second senior Democrat may face ethics trial

    Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke (R) talks with U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (L) before he speaks at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's 39th Annual Legislative Conference at the Washington Convention Center in Washington, September 25, 2009. REUTERS/Larry Downing

    Chairman of the Federal Reserve Ben Bernanke (R) talks with U.S. Rep. Maxine Waters (L) before he speaks at the Congressional Black Caucus Foundation's 39th Annual Legislative Conference at the Washington Convention Center in Washington, September 25, 2009.

    Credit: Reuters/Larry Downing

    WASHINGTON | Sat Jul 31, 2010 5:04pm EDT

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A second senior Democratic lawmaker may face a public ethics trial this fall, adding a new threat to their party's efforts to keep control of the House of Representatives in the November elections.

    The House ethics panel is expected to say as early as on Monday that its investigative subcommittee has found evidence that Representative Maxine Waters violated the chamber's ethics rules, a source familiar with the matter told Reuters.

    The House panel unveiled ethics charges against Representative Charles Rangel on Thursday. Both lawmakers face potential public trials just weeks before voters go to the polls for the November mid-term elections as a sour economy and anti-incumbent mood already are indicating Democratic losses.

    Both are leading members of the Congressional Black Caucus, making the cases highly sensitive as Democrats are working to get a big voter turnout by African-Americans, one of their traditional constituencies.

    "There is a growing sense among Democratic leadership that these issues pose a real threat to our ability to make our closing argument in the fall," a House Democratic aide said.

    Democrats have urged Rangel to cut a deal to avoid a trial they fear could become a political circus.

    Neither trial is expected to begin before September and it is still possible deals could be reached to close the cases before a public airing, though that possibility becomes less likely as the elections draw near.

    "Rangel and Waters need to seriously think about whether a public spectacle is worth the pain that will be inflicted on the party, especially when we have done so much to clean up the ethical and corruption messes left by Republicans," the aide said.

    The committee had been investigating Waters, a 10-term lawmaker from Los Angeles, after a bank in which her husband had stock received $12 million in federal bailout funds.

    Waters, who heads the House Financial Services Housing and Community Opportunity subcommittee, helped arrange a meeting of officials from that bank and other minority-owned financial institutions and Treasury Department officials, who later said they did not know of her husband's ties to the bank.

    Waters has said the meeting was in keeping with her long record of promoting minority-owned businesses and lending in underserved communities.

    She intends to fight the allegations, a source said.

    'WITH DIGNITY'

    The revelations about Waters come after President Barack Obama on Friday called ethics charges against Rangel "very troubling" and said he hoped the former head of the House tax writing panel could end his career "with dignity."

    Rangel faces 13 counts of violating House ethics rules, including failure to report rental income from a villa in the Dominican Republic and use of a rent-stabilized apartment for his campaign committee.

    A senior Democratic aide described Rangel as "more blustery than ever" and said a "showdown (is) looming on the case."

    So far just a handful of Democrats have publicly urged him to resign.

    Democrats won control of the House in 2006, promising to rid the chamber of corruption after a series of Republican ethical problems, including an influence-peddling scandal that resulted in prison time for a top Capitol Hill lobbyist.

    "Like Chairman Rangel, this is another example of Speaker (Nancy) Pelosi's most glaring broken promise: to 'drain the swamp' in Washington," said Michael Steel, spokesman for House Republican leader John Boehner.

    A House Democratic aide said, "This Democratic-led committee is showing that it's willing to aggressively go after its own (over possible ethical abuses), something Republicans never did when they were in charge."

    (Editing by Vicki Allen)

    Comments

    Jul 31, 2010 3:46am EDT

    I wonder if it might be possible to find out exactly who filed these ethical charges against these two Senators. Just a thought.

    pro2hd Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 7:20am EDT

    Evidence of the scumbags we elect. It’s time to throw them all out. That they can cut a deal with this arrogant Congressman is evidence of the complete corruption. What is the IRS doing with this? On and on it goes.

    honkers Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 8:51am EDT

    DemoRatts avoiding justice for their criminal output…

    father_moray Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 11:30am EDT

    @pro2hd… it’s really not important who filed these… cases should be filed against every single one of these corrupt @!#%#$
    Every single public elected official should have their full life’s reviewed and examined… Any thing that could appear suspicious should be grounds for dismissal. Also interesting to note that every one of the peopl caught have been elected for 10 or so years… so why not put a cap on terms because they get cocky after a while it seems

    GA_Chris Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 11:42am EDT

    Term limits. Start with Obama. He can serve 1/2 a term. Problem solved.

    AlitoRAF Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 11:45am EDT

    I always find it fascinating to see the partisanship that comes out around these kinds of charges. There are 435 members of the House of Representatives. If anyone could find even 3 who are NOT corrupt, I would consider that a complete miracle.

    Corruption knows no party. To claim that Democrats are more corrupt than Republicans is silly. They’re all criminals, and they all need to go.

    JackMack Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 12:50pm EDT

    It is a shame there is no TRUSTWORTHY 3rd party to oversee this cesspool that is congress. It doesn’t matter what their affiliation, these people went into politics for personal gain….that has been shown to be the case time and time again.

    ElDon Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 3:18pm EDT

    Are we R-E-A-L-L-Y that surprised by all of the Black Politicans being unethical? NOT! They are the ones who create laws that they feel they are above in following and the same lazy couwards who decry RACISM when they get caught. The Black Cacus in the Legislation better eatch out what “STAR” they attach their wagon to – they too could go down (even lower then they are now).

    RMSato Report As Abusive
     
     
    Jul 31, 2010 4:20pm EDT

    Yeah, Democrat or Republican it doesn’t matter. They should all be reviewed and tried for treason when found guilty of bribery like the constitution says. If you are still pro-Democrat or pro-Republican you should step back and take a better look. Politicians have ruined America for us and our kids, our grandkids, and their great grandkids.

    Trooth Report As Abusive
     
     
    This discussion is now closed. We welcome comments on our articles for a limited period after their publication.

     

     
    *We welcome comments that advance the story directly or with relevant tangential information. We try to block comments that use offensive language or appear to be spam and review comments frequently to ensure they meet our standards. If you see a comment that you believe is irrelevant or inappropriate, you can flag it to our editors by using the report abuse links. Views expressed in the comments do not represent those of Reuters.