Dec 10 - Fitch Ratings has assigned initial ratings to Methanex Corporation
(Methanex) as follows:
--Issuer Default Rating (IDR) 'BBB-';
--Senior unsecured revolver 'BBB-';
--Senior unsecured notes 'BBB-'.
The Rating Outlook is Stable. Approximately $967 million of debt as of Sept. 30,
2012 is affected by this rating action.
The ratings reflect Methanex's position as the largest supplier of methanol, its
global distribution network, relatively low production costs within the
industry, increased geographical diversification, operating linkage to the wide
oil-natural gas spread, and conservative financial management. Rating
limitations include the company's single product focus, planned capital
expenditures relating to its relocation of Chilean capacity to Geismar,
Louisiana, and output constraints facing its remaining Chile plants.
Methanex's Chilean plants have been underutilized for a number of years due to
the disrupted natural gas imports from Argentina. Methanex has supplemented lost
volumes with higher levels of purchased and commissioned methanol sales, but
margins on these sales are significantly lower than on Methanex's own
production. To address this, the company is in the process of dismantling one
plant capable of producing one million tonnes per year, relocating it to Geismar
and reassembling it. The company received air rights for the relocated plant on
November 13, 2012. Fitch believes it is likely the company will relocate a
second Chilean plant in Geismar. While the relocation will save the company
substantially in comparison to a greenfield plant, Methanex expects to spend
approximately $500 million in relocating one plant and roughly $1 billion
Methanex's margins in the past two years have benefited from advantageous
methanol pricing. Methanol prices have been supported by energy-related uses
linked to Brent crude pricing, significant and growing Chinese demand, and
rational industry capacity. Fitch anticipates these factors to continue to
support methanol prices. Methanex's margins are expected to benefit further when
they are able to capture the operating margin from Geismar-produced methanol.
Methanex's Geismar facility will be able to benefit from low priced natural gas
which is expected to prevail for the near to intermediate term due to the North
American shale boom. Natural gas is the feedstock and largest cost item for
Methanex's methanol production process. In addition, since issues in Chile first
erupted, the company has ramped up production in several other locations
including Egypt, New Zealand, and Medicine Hat. On a pro forma basis following
the relocation of two plants to Geismar, Fitch anticipates just 21% of the
company's nameplate capacity will be in Chile, versus a level as high as 56% in
Methanex solely produces and markets methanol, which has a variety of end uses,
from feedstock for formaldehyde and acetic acid in the chemical production chain
to energy-related uses in fuel blending. The more traditional uses in the
chemical production chain tend to grow with global production while
energy-related uses are growing at a faster rate. Methanex produces methanol in
Canada, Chile, Egypt, New Zealand and Trinidad and with the Geismar facility,
soon the United States, which diversifies the company's production and reduces
risks related to natural gas supply constraints.
The company's credit statistics have remained stable in 2012 as methanol prices
have remained relatively stable year over year. As calculated by Fitch,
Methanex's debt/EBITDA decreased from 1.93x in 2011 to 1.89x at Sept. 30, 2012.
For the LTM ending Sept. 30, 2012, Fitch-calculated EBITDA/gross interest was
6.84x and funds from operations interest coverage was 7.24x, versus 7.26x and
7.82x in 2011. FCF has been strong with $240 million in the LTM period ended
Sept. 30, 2012. With significant capital spend relating to its plant relocations
and anticipated restarting of New Zealand capacity, Fitch expects FCF to be
moderately negative in 2013 and 2014.
Methanex has a substantial liquidity position totaling $603 million as of Sept.
30, 2012 with $403 million in cash and an undrawn $200 million revolver that
expires mid-2015. The company has a light maturity schedule with only
amortizations of its limited recourse project financing (2013: $53 million and
2014: $62 million) until its $150 million 6% notes mature on Aug. 15, 2015.
Financial covenants contained in the company's revolving credit facility include
a debt-to-capitalization ratio of 50% and minimum interest coverage ratio of 2x,
both of which the company met comfortably as of Sept. 30, 2012. The company also
has a limitation on secured debt included in the revolver and notes outstanding.
Fitch notes that Methanex's contracts with gas suppliers offer a measure of
downside protection for creditors - contracts at several of the company's
methanol plants allow Methanex to pay low base natural gas prices but share the
upside with natural gas suppliers when methanol prices rise above certain
levels. From a creditor perspective, this helps the company by lowering its cost
structure under depressed methanol pricing conditions. Supply contracts with
this structure include Egypt, Trinidad, and the recently announced New Zealand
WHAT COULD TRIGGER A RATING ACTION
Positive: Future developments that could lead to positive rating actions
--Increased product diversification;
--Successful relocation and restart of Chilean plants in Geismar coincident with
attractive methanol prices supported by positive demand trends.
Negative: Future developments that could lead to negative rating actions
--Sustained period of methanol overcapacity depressing pricing and margins;
--A leveraging transaction moving debt to EBITDA above 3.5x on a sustained
--Large share repurchases or special dividends financed by debt.
Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.
Applicable Criteria and Relevant Research:
--'Corporate Rating Methodology' (Aug. 8, 2012);
--'Rating Chemical Companies' (Aug. 9, 2012).
Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
Corporate Rating Methodology
Rating Chemical Companies