January 17, 2013 / 7:41 PM / 5 years ago

TEXT - Fitch rates California's Menifee USD GO refunding bonds

Jan 17 - Fitch Ratings assigns a 'AA-' rating to the following Menifee Union
School District (the district), CA general obligation (GO) bonds: 

--$7.4 million 2013 GO refunding bonds.

In addition, Fitch affirms the 'AA-' rating on the following outstanding 
district GO bonds:

--$9.2 million 2002A GO bonds;
--$5 million 2002B GO bonds.

The Rating Outlook is Negative.

Purpose of Current Debt Issue: The bonds are being issued to advance refund 
certain maturities of the 2002A GO bonds and to pay the costs of issuance.


The bonds are secured by an unlimited ad valorem tax pledge on all taxable 
property within the district.


STRUCTURAL IMBALANCE: The Negative Outlook reflects a weakening in the 
district's fiscal position and ongoing challenges that the district faces in 
balancing a structural deficit. 

STILL SOUND BUT REDUCED RESERVE LEVELS: The district recorded an operating 
deficit (after transfers) in fiscal 2012 leaving the unrestricted fund balance 
at a reduced but still sound level. Additional reductions in reserve levels are 
projected over the next few years unless addition spending reductions are made.

TAX BASE STABILIZATION: Assessed value (AV) appears to be stabilizing after 
experiencing significant annual declines since fiscal year 2009. While still 
below prerecession levels, the resumption of residential home construction and 
increased home sales may provide support for future AV gains.

CHALLENGED ECONOMY: The local economy continues to experience stubbornly high 
unemployment rates and below average employment growth. Wealth indicators for 
the area are somewhat below the state average. 

ABOVE AVERAGE OVERALL DEBT LEVELS:  District debt levels are above average 
largely due to overlapping issuance. The district does not anticipate issuing 
any additional over the next few years and capital needs are considered 
manageable. District debt amortizes at a very slow rate. 


DIMINISHED UNRESTRICTED FUND BALANCE: An inability to stabilize financial 
operations leading to continued deterioration in the unrestricted fund balance 
below the level currently projected for fiscal 2013 likely would result in a 
rating downgrade.


The district serves approximately 9,000 students in western Riverside County, 
largely covering the city of Menifee and some of the surrounding areas. District
facilities include nine elementary schools, three middle schools, and one 


The district's financial operations were positive in fiscal 2011, but weakened 
in fiscal 2012. Due to the receipt of federal funds and better than budgeted 
state funding, fiscal 2011 operations produced a $2.8 million (4.7% of spending)
operating surplus, increasing the total fund balance to $13.8 million. The 
fiscal 2011 unrestricted fund balance (the sum of committed, assigned, and 
unassigned fund balances under GASB 54) was $12.9 million or a solid 21.9% of 

Financial performance weakened in fiscal 2012 with an operating deficit of $1.6 
million (2.6%). The unrestricted fund balance declined by $2.2 million with an 
ending balance of $10.7 million or a still sound 17.6%. 



The district's structural imbalance is projected to continue in fiscal 2013 with
an estimated deficit of $3.3 million. Fitch notes that the district historically
outperforms its financial estimates due to its conservative budgeting practices.
However, under current projections, the unrestricted fund balance would be 
reduced to $7.4 million or a still adequate 11.8% of spending. 


The district will be challenged to resolve the projected operating deficits in 
fiscal 2014 and future years, although the district retains some options to 
reduce spending. One of the more significant options would be raising class 
sizes to permitted maximums that would allow 43 teacher layoffs for 
approximately $3.2 million in savings. However, the school board did not pursue 
the option of teacher layoffs in fiscal 2013 and has implemented few layoffs in 
recent years. 


The district does not have a recent history of debt issuance for cash flow 
needs. It instead relies on internal cash flow borrowing from the capital 
facilities fund. The district borrowed $12 million in June 2012, with repayment 
due in June 2013. Currently available resources are estimated at about $27 


The local economy remains challenged with a stubbornly high unemployment rate of
12.9% (October 2012) and below average employment growth over the past year. 
Wealth levels in the area are somewhat below the state average with per capita 
and median household income at 85% and 89%, respectively. The district benefits 
from increasing enrollment, and preliminary figures reflect growth of 1.4% in 
fiscal 2013. 

The district's assessed value (AV) appears to be stabilizing with two 
consecutive years of modest growth. In fiscal 2012 and 2013, respectively, AV 
increased by 2.3% and 0.5%. While the gains are relatively limited, Fitch views 
the recent developments positively following the significant cumulative AV 
contraction of 26% from fiscal 2008 through fiscal 2011. The district reports 
increasing commercial and residential property development, but at a slower pace
than in prior years.


The district's overall debt burden is above average at $4,546 per capita and 
5.8% of AV. The district's direct debt comprises a relatively small portion of 
the overall debt burden at $655 per capita and 0.8% of AV. The district's 
capital needs are manageable and no additional debt issuance is expected. 
However, amortization is very slow, with just 25% of debt retired in 10 years. 

Pension costs were a manageable 5.8% of spending in fiscal 2012. The district's 
other post-employment benefits liability is minimal with an estimated unfunded 
actuarial accrued liability of $661,123.

Our Standards:The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.
0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below