February 4, 2013 / 7:31 PM / 5 years ago

TEXT-Fitch rates Norfolk, Va. water revs 'AA+'

Feb 4 - Fitch Ratings assigns an 'AA+' rating to the following city of
Norfolk, VA (the city) revenue bonds:

--Approximately $44 million water revenue bonds, series 2013.

Bond proceeds will be used to fund various capital improvements to the water
system (the system), and pay issuance costs.

The bonds are scheduled for competitive sale the week of Feb. 11.

In addition, Fitch affirms the following:

--Approximately $290 million outstanding water revenue bonds at 'AA+'.

The Rating Outlook is Stable.


The bonds are secured by a senior lien on and pledge of the net revenues of
system. The city will not fund a debt service reserve for the series 2013 bonds.


LARGE REGIONAL SERVICE PROVIDER: Norfolk's water system is the primary service
provider for a large, mostly residential, and economically stable region. The
system directly serves more than 64,000 retail accounts and an additional
196,000 retail customers through wholesale contracts.

coverage levels to be adequate given that more than 50% of operating revenues
are derived from wholesale customers, making the system somewhat unique. Fitch
is comfortable with coverage levels more consistent with those of wholesale
systems given the ability to pass through costs and, importantly, the system's
strong liquidity.

STRONG SYSTEM CAPACITY: Ample water supply and treatment capacity provide
operating flexibility and limit short-term capital needs, which are mainly to
repair, replace, and maintain system facilities.

MANAGEABLE DEBT BURDEN: Debt ratios are manageable when including the system's
direct retail customers and all of the retail customers it serves on a wholesale
basis. A mainly debt-financed capital improvement plan (CIP, with about $90
million issued over the next five years) is expected to only modestly raise the
debt burden.


The city of Norfolk (general obligation bonds rated 'AA+' by Fitch) is located
in the Hampton Roads region of Virginia, along the Atlantic Ocean. The city
covers 66 square miles and has an estimated population of 244,000.

The system is the primary water provider for the entire region, providing retail
service to its own roughly 64,500 mostly residential customers as well as
wholesale service to the city of Virginia Beach (water and sewer revenue bonds
rated 'AAA'), the U.S. Navy, and other nearby communities. The entire service
area covers more than 330 square miles, includes a total retail customer base of
more than 261,000 customers, and serves a population of about 1,100,000
according to city estimates. Water supply sources are diverse and ample,
providing long-term stability to the system.

The area is mostly residential in nature, although its favorable location and
significant waterway access promotes significant industrial, trade, and tourist
activities. The economy, which is anchored by the presence of the U.S. military,
continues to expand, with employment gains in business and other services. A
large commercial port and Norfolk International Airport provide significant
employment and trade opportunities. The city continues to focus its economic
development efforts on downtown and neighborhood revitalization to diversify the
economy and help offset the sizable proportion of tax-exempt property. The
city's unemployment rate remains above historical levels at 7.2% in December
2012, although the rate is lower than the 8.2% recorded in Dec. 2011.

The system serves several utilities on a wholesale basis, leading to some
concentration in its revenue stream. Norfolk's direct retail customers comprise
a little less than half of the system's total revenues. While concentration is
moderately high, service is provided to several highly-rated utility systems
mainly through long-term contracts, and flows have been relatively stable. The
city of Virginia Beach is the system's largest wholesale customer, making up 32%
of total revenues in fiscal 2012. Pursuant to the long-term water services
contract which expires in 2030, Norfolk receives and treats raw water from
Virginia Beach and conveys potable water back to Virginia Beach up to an average
of 45 millions of gallons per day (mgd).

Virginia Beach is charged based on a cost of service approach, whereby it pays
Norfolk a proportionate share of operations and maintenance expenses,
depreciation expense, and a return on assets. Fitch notes the charges are well
secured as they are designated as operating expenses of the Virginia Beach water
and sewer utility system and paid ahead of any debt service related thereto.

Norfolk also provides service to the city of Chesapeake (utility system rated
'AA', with a Stable Outlook), the Western Tidewater Water Authority, and the
U.S. Navy. Service to Chesapeake consists of a small amount of treated water and
a larger amount of surplus raw water, which is paid for on a take-or-pay basis.
Revenues from Chesapeake accounted for about 10% of total revenues in fiscal
2012 while the U.S. Navy comprised 11%. The city is still negotiating terms for
extension of the U.S. Navy contract, which have typically been short-term
three-year contracts. Management expects a contract extension for an additional
three-year term.

Water supplies are extensive and diverse, consisting of a series of eight
city-owned surface water reservoirs totaling 15.2 billion gallons in storage
capacity. In addition, supply comes from Lake Gaston (a Virginia Beach-owned
water source) and two supplemental sources consisting of intakes from the
Blackwater and Nottoway rivers. Four deep groundwater wells (located in Suffolk)
are also available during dry periods. The city estimates it has enough supply
to serve the needs of the region for another 50 years. Two water treatment
facilities have a current capacity of 136 mgd, which is more than twice the
average daily demand. Infrastructure capacity is ample, allowing the system to
focus long-term capital needs on system upgrade and rehabilitation.

The system's stable financial profile is evidenced by strong historical
financial margins and good debt service coverage. Historical debt service
coverage of between 1.5x and 1.8x on the senior lien bonds was considered
adequate for the rating, especially given the hybrid nature of the system, its
regional importance, and strong liquidity levels. Due in large measure to a
decline in annual debt service, the system generated roughly 2.0x debt service
coverage on the senior bonds in fiscal 2012. All-in coverage including general
obligation bonds (which are paid out of the system's general reserve) was
slightly lower but still solid at 1.8x.

Operating margins have averaged more than 50% over the past six fiscal years,
which is considered strong. However, the system has annually transferred more
than $8 million to the city's general fund as an annual return on investment
since 2005, which limits the amount of free cash flow available for capital
spending and lowers overall fixed coverage. The annual transfer, while not
unusual for a utility system, is high at roughly 10% of annual revenues, and is
expected to continue. Free cash flow (revenues available after operating costs,
debt service, and transfers) has been weak historically, averaging just 73% of
annual depreciation. Coverage of both debt service and transfers was adequate at
1.6x in 2012.

Pro forma financial results show debt service coverage of 1.9x all-in for
fiscals 2013 and 2014, and about 1.4x net of annual system transfers. Coverage
begins to decline in fiscal 2015 due mostly to proposed issuance of debt and an
increase in annual debt service. The projections for fiscals 2015 through 2017
show coverage margins similar to results demonstrated prior to fiscal 2012

The system's balance sheet resources are strong despite the large annual
transfers to the general fund. Including operating reserves, repair and
replacement fund balances, rate stabilization funds, and the unrestricted
general reserve, the system had about $56 million in total resources, which
equaled a strong 462 days cash on hand as of fiscal year-end 2012. Other
important liquidity ratios such as working capital and current ratios are also
above average. A strong liquidity profile provides significant financial
flexibility, which, in addition to the partially wholesale nature of the system,
helps mitigate the below-average expected pro forma debt service coverage.

The system ended fiscal 2012 with about $330 million in total debt outstanding,
leading to a somewhat mixed but manageable debt profile. Debt is a somewhat high
70% of net plant in fiscal 2012. However, debt per capita, which takes into
account the entire service area population, was a low $326 for the same period
and below the median for the rating category. In addition, when including the
retail customers Norfolk serves indirectly through its large wholesale
contracts, debt per customer was just $1,266, moderately below the categorical
median ($1,828).

Principal amortization of outstanding bonds is average, with 40% of principal
retiring within 10 years and 77% retiring in 20 years. The $97 million five-year
CIP is expected to be mainly funded with debt, including the series 2013 bonds.
But Fitch projects the debt burden will remain manageable. Capital projects will
focus mainly on water line replacement and rehabilitation. Management expects to
issue an additional total of $74.5 million in parity bonds in fiscals 2015 and

Retail rates are set by the city council and are reviewed annually during the
budget process. The retail rate structure is primarily consumption-based, which
introduces some vulnerability to weather and other factors affecting demand.
After double-digit rate increases in 2004 and 2005, increases have been moderate
at approximately 3.5% annually. In 2012, residential rates for 1,000 cubic feet
of use per month (about 7,500 gallons) were competitive relative to other
regional utilities at about $42, but a somewhat high 1.2% of median household
income. Rates are expected to remain competitive despite automatic annual rate
increases of 3.5% designed to provide for baseline revenue growth. The rate
increases do not need city council approval.

Additional information is available at 'www.fitchratings.com'. The ratings above
were solicited by, or on behalf of, the issuer, and therefore, Fitch has been
compensated for the provision of the ratings.

In addition to the sources of information identified in the U.S. Municipal
Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria, this action was additionally informed by
information from Creditscope.

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
--'Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria' (June 12, 2012);
--'U.S. Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Criteria' (Aug. 3, 2012);
--'2013 Water and Sewer Medians' (Dec. 5, 2012);
--'2013 Outlook: Water and Sewer Sector' (Dec. 5, 2012).

Applicable Criteria and Related Research:
2013 Water and Sewer Medians
U.S. Water and Sewer Revenue Bond Rating Criteria
Revenue-Supported Rating Criteria

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below