U.N. rights body slammed for weakness on Tibet, Darfur

By Stephanie Nebehay

GENEVA (Reuters) - Activists criticized the U.N. Human Rights Council for failing to take a strong stand against violence in Tibet and Darfur during its month-long session which ended on Friday.

They also criticized the 47 member-state forum for ending the work of its expert on the Democratic Republic of Congo despite continuing mass killings and rapes in the country.

"These are three examples where we think the council has fallen down on the job," Peggy Hicks, global advocacy director for the New York-based Human Rights Watch, told a news briefing.

"The council needs to focus more on saving lives and less on allowing governments to save face."

The Geneva-based Council was set up two years ago to replace the U.N. Human Rights Commission, which was widely criticized for failing to overcome political alliances and take a strong stand on issues including China's rights record.

The new body has come under fire for failing to speak out against flagrant violations and for bowing to many developing countries' objections to what they see as interference in their internal affairs -- criticisms that also plagued the commission.

Chinese diplomats raised procedural motions to disrupt the Council's debate on Tibet this week, during which Western countries pressured Beijing to let foreigners back into Tibet to assess the consequences of its crackdown on protests and riots.

China says 19 people were killed in the unrest by Tibetan mobs, but the Tibet government-in-exile in Dharamsala, India, has estimated there have been 140 deaths in the violence. There have also been reports of mass arrests, mostly ethnic Tibetans.