| NEW YORK, March 1
NEW YORK, March 1 J.C. Penney Co Inc
chief Ron Johnson knew before doing a deal with Martha Stewart
that it would create a conflict with rival Macy's Inc,
which already had a relationship with her.
Johnson was testifying in New York state court on Friday in
proceedings brought by Macy's against his company and Martha
Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc over their proposed deal.
The chief executive wrung his hands as a lawyer for Macy's
grilled him over an email he wrote to a board member saying
Martha Stewart would have to "break" her agreement with Macy's
if he was going to "pull off" a deal with her.
Macy's sued Martha Stewart Living and J.C. Penney after the
they announced plans in December 2011 to launch Martha Stewart
boutiques in about 700 J.C. Penney department stores. The
boutiques are part of Johnson's strategy to re-invent the
102-year-old retailer, which released dismal holiday shopping
season results on Thursday.
Macy's claims that, by signing a deal with J.C. Penney, MSLO
breached its contract to sell products in certain categories
such as cookware, bedding and bath items, exclusively at Macy's.
A non-jury trial is underway before Justice Jeffrey Oing in
New York state court in Manhattan.
Johnson testified he got the idea for putting Martha Stewart
in J.C. Penney stores when he read in the spring of 2011 that
her company had hired the Blackstone Group to evaluate
opportunities. He believed Martha Stewart's influence on home
goods was greater than the influence of any designer on the
Theodore Grossman, representing Macy's, asked Johnson about
an Aug. 14, 2011, email he sent to J.C. Penney board member
Steven Roth, whose Vornado Realty is Penney's second-largest
shareholder. Roth had said in an earlier email that Martha
Stewart's exclusive deal with Macy's would be a "major
"Martha could be the foundation of a reinvented home,"
Johnson wrote in the email. "Macy's deal is key. We need to find
a way to break the renewal right."
Johnson said that "break" did not exactly mean breaking the
"I knew there would have to be an amendment ... for us to do
what we wanted," Johnson told the court. "The word 'break' meant
there would have to be a change ... for us to carry the
products" in certain categories.
Johnson also used the word "break" in an Aug. 17, 2011,
email to a Penney executive.
"I need to propose a deal so she can go to Terry L at Macy's
and break their agreement," he wrote. "That is the only issue in
the way of success at this point."
Terry Lundgren, the chief executive of Macy's, testified in
the trial on Monday that when Martha Stewart told him the night
before the public announcement that she was starting an alliance
with his rival, he hung up the telephone and has not spoken to
Martha Stewart is Macy's No. 1 brand of home goods, Lundgren
testified. Sales increased 8 percent last year, twice that of
Macy's as a whole, Lundgren said.
A key issue in the trial is whether the proposed Martha
Stewart shops to be set up inside J.C. Penney stores are
considered Martha Stewart stores. Under its contract with
Macy's, Martha Stewart Living can sell product categories that
are now exclusive to Macy's if MSLO opens its own stores. Macy's
says the proposed boutiques at J.C. Penney are not the same as
Martha Stewart is expected to take the stand on Tuesday.
The testimony capped off a tough week for Johnson and J.C.
Penney. After Penney shares plunged 17 percent on Thursday,
analysts forecast Johnson will have until back-to-school season
in August to show he has put the retailer on the right road.
The cases are Macy's Inc v. Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia
Inc, 650297/2012, and Macy's Inc v. J.C. Penney Corp,
652861/2012, New York State Supreme Court, New York County.