* Pentagon plan revised with eye on Iran
* Includes "proven" sea-based, land-based missile shields
* Bush-era plan would have covered only 75 pct of Europe
By Jim Wolf
WASHINGTON, April 15 U.S. anti-ballistic
missile systems will cover all of Europe by 2018, a senior
Pentagon official said, laying out an ambitious target for
defending against a perceived threat from Iran.
"One hundred percent," Bradley Roberts, deputy assistant
secretary of defense for nuclear and missile defense policy,
said in reply to a question at a hearing of a House of
Representatives Armed Services subcommittee Thursday.
Roberts said the Obama administration was putting "proven"
sea-based and land-based missile shields into Europe as quickly
as possible as part of a revised shield announced last
September to any Iranian ballistic-missile strike.
Full coverage of NATO territory in Europe would be achieved
around 2018, he said, when a second land-based site is to be
established in northern Europe for updated Raytheon Co (RTN.N)
Standard Missile-3 missile interceptors.
The Pentagon dubs this Phase 3 of its new "adaptive"
missile-defense plans, a continued bone of contention with
In running through the timeline, Roberts misspoke to the
panel, referring to Phase 3 as starting in roughly 2015, rather
than the 2018 timeframe as correct, said Navy Commander Bob
Mehal, a Pentagon spokesman.
The United States says the multibillion-dollar effort is
designed to defend against Iranian short- and medium-range
missiles that could be tipped with chemical, biological or
Iran could produce enough bomb-grade fuel for a nuclear
weapon in as little as one year but would probably need three
to five years to deploy a "usable" one, two top U.S. generals
told Congress on Wednesday.
President Barack Obama decided last year to scrap a
Bush-era plan to deploy a longer-range missile-defense system
in Poland and the Czech Republic. Instead, he opted for the
phased approach as better matched to the assessment of Iran's
The Bush plan, featuring 10 two-stage Boeing Co (BA.N)
ground-based interceptors that would have gone to Poland, would
have provided only 75 percent coverage of Europe.
"We heard immediately from vulnerable allies in the ... 75
percent equation, those left out, that they were looking for
protection," Roberts said in reply to Michael Turner of Ohio,
the top Republican on the Strategic Forces subcommittee.
"We wanted to meet their demands for protection and scale
the capability as the threat evolves and as our capability
improves," Roberts added.
Mehal, the spokesman, said the United States will seek seek
"appropriate cost and/or burden sharing" in building out the
The United States is discussing the potential location of a
forward-based Raytheon AN/TPY-2 radar station it wants to
deploy in southern Europe by the end of next year, Roberts
said. Phase 1 of Obama's plan also involves ships equipped with
Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT.N) Aegis combat systems built for
missile defense and SM-3 interceptors.
In the second phase, from roughly 2015, improved
interceptors and sensors are to be employed along with an
initial land-based SM-3 site somewhere in southern Europe.
The last two phases would produce new generations of SM-3
missiles, co-developed with Japan and deployed on land and at
sea, with greater speed and range for coverage of all of Europe
and enhanced defense of U.S. soil.
Lieutenant General Patrick O'Reilly, director of the
Pentagon's Missile Defense Agency, told the panel that the
ground-based interceptors due to have gone to Poland would have
cost $70 million apiece vs. $10 million to $15 million for the
(Reporting by Jim Wolf; Editing by Gary Hill)