NEW YORK New York's so-called "Cannibal Cop" was
cleared of all charges by a divided U.S. appeals court on
Thursday, more than two years after a jury convicted him of
plotting to kill and eat women.
Former New York City Police Officer Gilberto Valle was found
guilty at trial in March 2013 of conspiring to kidnap women and
illegally accessing a police database to collect information on
potential victims.
But the trial judge last year threw out his conviction on
the conspiracy charge, a decision that the 2nd U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals in New York affirmed on Thursday in a 2-1
ruling.
"This is a case about the line between fantasy and criminal
intent," Circuit Judge Barrington Parker wrote for the majority.
"Fantasizing about committing a crime, even a crime of violence
against a real person whom you know, is not a crime."
The appeals court also vacated Valle's conviction for using
the database, finding that federal law does not prohibit
individuals from accessing a computer they are normally
authorized to use, even if they do so for an improper purpose.
In a sharply worded dissent, Circuit Judge Chester Straub
said Valle should be convicted of both charges.
"It was, and remains, for the jury to determine the factual
question of whether Valle had criminal intent," he wrote. "The
jury considered and rejected Valle's defense that he was simply
pretending to commit a crime."
A spokesman for Preet Bharara, the U.S. Attorney in
Manhattan, did not immediately comment. Valle's appellate lawyer
was not immediately available for comment.
The trial provided a rare glimpse of a dark corner of the
Internet, where like-minded fetishists trade explicit materials
and discuss violent fantasies. It also raised a difficult legal
question: when does a person's fantasizing about committing a
crime cross the line into actual criminal conduct?
Valle was not accused of harming any women. Instead,
prosecutors said he discussed with other online enthusiasts his
intention to abduct, torture, cook and eat women.
Prosecutors said he took concrete steps to put his plans
into action, including looking up women's information in the
database and researching chloroform recipes.
But Valle's lawyers argued that those acts were part of his
fetish and that he never intended to commit an actual crime.
A number of privacy advocacy groups, including the
Electronic Frontier Foundation, filed friend-of-the-court
briefs, warning that convicting Valle would violate the
constitutional right to free speech.