For McCain team, energy cures many ills

Thu Sep 4, 2008 6:59pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Emily Kaiser - Analysis

ST. PAUL (Reuters) - The McCain presidential campaign appears to have one main answer to questions about how it will address a faltering U.S. economy, foreign policy issues and national security -- energy.

On a day when Wall Street recorded its steepest decline in more than two months and with investors worried about growing job losses, the single-issue focus drew a rebuke from Sen. Barack Obama, who accused Republicans of ignoring the economy.

Chants of "Drill, baby, drill!" erupted at the Republican National Convention in St. Paul on Wednesday night as speaker after speaker espoused the benefits of expanded U.S. oil exploration.

Sen. John McCain said his vice presidential pick, Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, was qualified to be commander in chief in part because she "understands the energy issues better than anybody I know in Washington."

His economic adviser Douglas Holtz-Eakin said energy would top McCain's policy list in his first 100 days in the White House, but there has been scant detail on how a McCain administration would ease the burden of skyrocketing energy prices or end oil imports.

That may be because accomplishing those goals will require stepping up government investment in alternative energy and cutting usage. In other words, Americans would need to spend more and consume less, not the most popular ideas on the campaign trail.

"I don't think anybody here can name four specific things that John McCain would do that would actually help your pocketbook," Obama, McCain's Democratic rival in the November 4 election, told reporters in York, Pennsylvania.

McCain was to give a speech later on Thursday that his campaign said would include policy prescriptions.

'NATIONAL SECURITY'

"There is little doubt that energy and national security are closely linked," said Michael Greenstone, an economist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

"However, there is a world market in oil and even with the proposed increases in drilling, our reserves will just be a portion of the total. So as long as oil remains a key part of our energy portfolio, we will never achieve energy independence," he said.

Edward Snyder, dean of the University of Chicago's Graduate School of Business, said the emphasis on drilling sounded "jingoistic," and taxing imported oil, although politically unpopular, would do far more to curb usage.

In her comments on Wednesday, Palin linked oil imports to national security and foreign policy, listing threats from Russia, Iran and Venezuela -- all major oil producers -- and stressing the need to find sufficient U.S. supplies.

Palin has supported drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, and pushed through a tax increase on oil and gas producers last year, doubling Alaska's energy revenues to more than $10 billion. That may not sit well with oil companies, which are big Republican contributors.

Republicans have taken in $14.7 million from employees and political action committees of firms such as Exxon Mobil Corp, Chevron Corp and Valero Energy this election cycle, the Center for Responsive Politics said. That was about three times as much as Democrats collected.  Continued...

 

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video

Special Report

A Greenpeace activist displays signs symbolising genetically modified maize crops during a protest in front of the European Union headquarters in Brussels November 24, 2008.  REUTERS/Thierry Roge
Answer to feeding the world or Frankenfood?

With malnutrition afflicting more than a billion people, few dispute the need for a solution. But are rich companies like Monsanto -- who play a powerful role in how and what the world eats -- helping or harming?  Full Article