NEW YORK Jan 3 The New York Federal Reserve
Bank filed a motion on Friday to dismiss a lawsuit brought by a
former employee who claimed she was fired after refusing to
alter a critical examination of Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
The ex-employee, Carmen Segarra, said after examining
Goldman's legal and compliance divisions for seven months, she
found the bank did not have policies to prevent conflicts of
interest as required by regulation.
In a 30-page court document, lawyers for the New York Fed
said some of Segarra's claims were "implausible owing to
numerous contradictions within her pleading."
"Most glaringly, the allegation that Goldman Sachs did not
have any conflict of interest policy is belied by plaintiff's
own exhibits, which show that the 'nonexistent' policies were,
in fact, available on Goldman Sachs's public website," the
Attorneys who filed the motion in federal court in the
Southern District of New York and Segarra's lawyer, Linda
Stengle, did not immediately respond to a request for comment. A
Goldman Sachs spokesperson also did not respond to a request for
According to Segarra's lawsuit, the New York Fed's Legal
Compliance and Risk team voted to downgrade Goldman's annual
rating pertaining to policies and procedures as a result of
findings. She alleges that two New York Fed officials overseeing
the Wall Street bank, Michael Silva and his deputy Michael Koh,
were concerned a downgrade would hurt the Goldman's business.
Both Koh and Silva are named as defendants in Segarra's
lawsuit, as well as her former supervisor, Johnathon Kim.
Segarra was assigned to Goldman's legal and compliance
divisions from October 2011 until May 2012, and looked into
three controversial transactions related to Solyndra, Capmark
and the merger of El Paso and Kinder Morgan Inc. At that
point, Kim, Silva and Koh fired her and had her escorted from
the building by security guards after weeks of disputes and
pressure to change her examination findings, the lawsuit said.
The case is Segarra v. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York
et al in the U.S District Court for the Southern District Of New
York, No. 1:13-cv-07173-RA