WASHINGTON, June 25 With oil still flowing into
the Gulf of Mexico, the U.S. government is set to flood the
offshore drilling industry with new laws and regulations.
Following dozens of hearings and heated political rhetoric,
several key Congressional panels will begin considering and
voting on legislation crafted in response the biggest oil spill
in U.S. history next week.
The Obama administration has vowed to move forward with
aggressive regulations for oil and natural gas companies
operating in federal waters, despite a federal court's ruling
overturning its six-month moratorium on deepwater drilling.
Ultimately, the oil disaster is almost certain to reshape
the role government plays in overseeing oil and natural gas
exploration and production off the U.S. coastlines.
Following is a look at some of the possible actions and new
laws and regulations that may result from the spill.
CRACKING THE WHIP ON BIG OIL
Lawmakers in both chambers have begun working on legislation
to crack down on the offshore drilling sector in the wake of
the Gulf spill.
The Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee on
Wednesday will vote on several bills relating to the spill,
including measures that would increase financial requirements
for drillers and raise civil and criminal penalties for rule
violators.
The committee is also considering measures that would
require that the Interior Department ensure any companies
bidding on new leases have met all safety requirements for
their existing operations and have complied with any
obligations for damages in prior accidents.
This measure, in particular, could affect those companies
involved in the Deepwater Horizon rig spill.
Also on Wednesday, the House Natural Resources Committee
will hold a hearing on expansive energy legislation that would
eliminate any environmental review exemptions for offshore
projects and require drillers to have technology demonstrated
to be able to handle oil spills.
Lawmakers are still debating how much to raise the amount of
money BP (BP.L) would be required to dole out for economic
losses caused by the spill from the current cap of $75 million.
Some lawmakers have called for a $10 billion cap, while others
have said there should be no cap on damages companies face.
While it is unclear exactly how much the cap will be lifted,
it is almost certain that BP and other oil companies drilling
offshore will be responsible for covering much more than $75
million in economic losses in the future.
TIGHTER DRILLING RULES
Despite a federal court's decision this week to block the
the government's drilling ban, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar
has pledged to issue an order for a new moratorium.
Although the department has been scant on details, Salazar
signalled this week that the new ban may be more targeted and
would include criteria for ending the moratorium.
[ID:nN23116856]
Any drilling ban will likely face additional legal
challenges.
Politically the Obama administration will be under intense
pressure from Gulf state lawmakers to shorten or weaken the
ban, which they say could cost their region hundreds of
thousands of jobs.
Even if the ban is lifted, any new drilling will be done
under intense scrutiny and with extensive technological and
environmental requirements.
The department has already issued new safety rules for
projects operating in shallow waters, in addition to mandating
more detailed blowout prevention and response plans.
PUNISHING BP
Depending on the outcome of federal investigations, BP and
other companies involved in the Gulf oil spill could face
criminal prosecution.
The U.S. Justice Department announced early this month that
it has launched a criminal and civil investigation into the
environmental catastrophe.
In a worst-case scenario, criminal charges could lead the
Interior Department to limit BP's offshore drilling
activities.
The department could strip BP of its ability to operate its
offshore oil fields or suspend its leases, but those moves
would have to be balanced against U.S. energy needs.
The government also has an interest in not completely crippling BP's U.S. energy business, because it wants the
company to pay billions of dollars in damages and clean up.
(Reporting by Ayesha Rascoe; Editing by Lisa Shumaker)