Top oil firms spend more but get less crude
By Alex Lawler - Analysis
LONDON (Reuters) - The world's three largest fully publicly traded oil firms are investing billions of dollars more, but there is little sign yet the extra spending is leading to higher production.
Exxon Mobil Corp. (XOM.N), Royal Dutch Shell Plc (RDSa.L) and BP Plc (BP.L) posted falling 2007 output, even though they upped capital spending to over $60 billion and some expect a further rise this year.
The drop reflects the way higher oil prices reduce the amount of oil companies get under production-sharing agreements with governments, and declining supply from ageing fields in some regions like the North Sea.
"Production growth is still a real problem for the UK majors," said Ivor Pether, who manages the equivalent of $1.4 billion at Royal London Asset Management, including BP and Shell shares.
Violence in Nigeria, and moves by countries like Venezuela to get more cash and control from firms that work their oil and gas fields, have also cut supply for some companies.
Oil firms are lifting spending after years of under-investment and rising demand helped send prices skyrocketing. Shell and BP plan increases of up to 14 percent and 16 percent respectively in 2008.
But much of the boost is being soaked up by rising costs, as well as the drop in the dollar. Also, it takes years to bring new fields into production, meaning the impact of higher spending on supply is some way off.
"The lead time between exploration and production is about seven to eight years," said analyst Jason Kenney of ING.
"So new investment today is not going to come through until 2015 in terms of production, cashflow and earnings."
SHELL OUTPUT
Shell posted a 4.5 percent drop in oil and gas output to 3.315 million barrels of oil equivalent (boepd) in 2007, the largest drop among the top three oil companies, and said supply may fall further this year.
Production was hit by the reduction of Shell's stake in the Sakhalin gas project in Russia following government pressure and snags at Shell's unit in Canada which squeezes crude from tar sands.
Shell backtracked from previous targets for production. Chief Financial Officer Peter Voser declined to restate a plan for 1-2 percent growth to 2010 and said output was likely to fall "slightly" in 2008.
"Shell is still in this rather dull period, where the startup of big, long-lasting projects is still some way off in terms of investors' time horizons," Pether said.
Resources are increasingly located where extraction is technically harder, such as beneath seas that ice over in winter off Sakhalin Island, or in politically volatile regions like the Middle East. Continued...

