Weak economy could curb Obama coal cleanup plan
By Bruce Nichols - Analysis
HOUSTON (Reuters) - As U.S. president, Barack Obama is likely to tighten environmental regulations on generating power from coal, but his ambitions could be reined in by the cost of such measures given a weak U.S. economy.
Obama's campaign proposal to fight global warming - by cutting heat-trapping carbon dioxide emissions to 80 percent less than 1990 levels by 2050 - could require big U.S. utilities to spend billions to comply.
But coal-fired power plants, which generate about half of U.S. electricity and 40 percent of U.S. greenhouse gas output, will have to be the backbone of America's power grid for decades because U.S. coal is plentiful and relatively cheap.
"Coal is going to be clamped down on from mine mouth to smokestack, but it's not as though coal is going out of style," said Kevin Book, an energy analyst with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey Group Inc FBR.N.
"Obama cannot ignore the economic side of the story," Book said.
Just before the November 4 election, Republicans seized on Obama's comments to a newspaper that U.S. utilities could face bankruptcy if they build new coal plants. However, utility officials generally see the Democratic president-elect as supportive of their industry.
Earlier, Obama handed out flyers in Kentucky with a picture of coal barges on the Ohio River and stating, "Barack Obama believes in clean Kentucky coal." He has backed pioneering power plants that burn coal but capture carbon emissions.
A NEW CHAPTER
On Tuesday, Obama - whose home state of Illinois is a major coal producer - said the United States would "engage vigorously" in climate change talks when he is president and pledged, despite the financial crisis, to fight the problem.
"My presidency will mark a new chapter in America's leadership on climate change that will strengthen our security and create millions of new jobs in the process," Obama said in a video address to a global warming summit in California.
Obama wants coal-burning U.S. utilities such as Southern Co (SO.N) and American Electric Power (AEP.N) to find cleaner ways to use America's coal reserves - which are expected to last about 250 years at current rates of use. He also wants to develop nonpolluting solar and wind energy and to push programs to encourage reductions in greenhouse gas emissions.
Some U.S. mining industry officials fear Obama could impose draconian regulations on the use of coal, though such worries are not universal across the industry.
"I think the impact on the industry will be huge," said John Wellford of Marsh Fork Development Co, a small West Virginia producer, who warns tighter federal regulations could shut down much of the industry.
Other industry officials say that concerns about the economy and the need for affordable energy will balance environmental worries as U.S. consumers suffer through one of the worst economic contractions in decades.
The National Mining Association, which lobbies for big coal companies such as Peabody Energy (BTU.N) and Arch Coal (ACI.N), predicts that Obama will be pragmatic in his energy policy. Continued...


