Dalai Lama envoy says Tibet talks ill-timed

Fri Jul 4, 2008 10:37am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Abhishek Madhukar

DHARAMSALA, India (Reuters) - An envoy of the Dalai Lama said on Friday the latest round of talks with China was "tough", calling the dialogue ill-timed because Beijing was preoccupied with the Olympic Games.

The secretive talks, held from July 1-2 in Beijing, aimed to mend fences with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader, but were marked by an aggressive reiteration of the Chinese allegation that the Dalai Lama instigated the March unrest in Tibet.

"It was tough," Lodi Gyari told Reuters. "Before the Olympics it is not feasible to hold talks ... they are obsessed with the Olympics.

"There is some widespread belief that they are only meeting because of the Olympics," he said of the talks, which could burnish China's international image weeks before the Games.

This was the second meeting between the two sides since a March crackdown on protests against Chinese rule in Tibet, which led to an international diplomatic chorus for China to hold a dialogue with the exiled Tibetan spiritual leader.

Tibet then became a flashpoint for anti-China protests that disrupted the Olympic torch relay around the world and led to calls for state leaders to boycott the Beijing Games, which open on Aug 8.

Lodi Gyari was expected to brief the Dalai Lama and the Tibetan government-in-exile officials about the talks on Friday.

The two sides will meet again after the Olympics, but Lodi Gyari warned that unless the Chinese authorities were serious any dialogue was just a waste of time.

"After Olympics when we hold talks, we will know what the true attitude is," he said.

(Writing by Krittivas Mukherjee; Editing by Alex Richardson)

 
Photo

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
America’s perennial Vietnam syndrome

History does not repeat itself, but the wartime struggles of President Obama in 2009 and President Johnson in 1963 are striking in their similarities. Does the ghost of Vietnam still hang over the White House?  Commentary