Civilian casualties fuel Afghan conflict

Wed Jul 16, 2008 5:41am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Jon Hemming - Analysis

KABUL (Reuters) - The killing of civilians in foreign military airstrikes is shattering Afghans' support for keeping international troops in their troubled land and driving angry young men into the arms of the Taliban, analysts say.

International troops do not target civilians and say they do their utmost to avoid harming them, but even as Taliban suicide bombers kill more innocents, it is foreign forces and the Afghan government they support that bear the brunt of the backlash.

"Such acts provoke public hatred towards internal and foreign forces and force people to join the enemy who encourages them to carry out terrorist and suicide attacks," said the state-run Hewad newspaper after the first of two controversial airstrikes this month.

First, Afghan officials say, U.S. aircraft killed 15 civilians in the northeast on July 4, then just three days later, hit a wedding in the east, killing 47, mostly women and children.

"The Americans will soon face new resistance with new motives if they continue such operations and do not care even a little about the lives of the people," the state-run daily Anis said.

While the U.S. military first of all denied civilians had been hit, then launched what is likely to be a lengthy investigation, most Afghans have already made up their minds.

"Such arbitrary bombing raids and brutal killings have been repeated so many times during the past nearly seven years that now it is difficult to believe these foreign forces have come to our country for assistance," the pro-government Weesa daily said.

"There is a perception problem," said NATO's civilian spokesman in Afghanistan, Mark Laity.

"But it is a perception problem not a reality problem. The reality is that we are very careful and the number of mistakes we make is very small."

The perception though that international forces are not careful enough when launching airstrikes is becoming entrenched in Afghan public opinion, and officials have been known to make hasty claims of civilian casualties.

FOG OF WAR

The Taliban also claim troops wantonly kill civilians almost every day, adding to the fog of war.

The remoteness of most airstrikes, the speed with which bodies are buried and a cultural taboo against mostly male reporters seeing wounded women in hospitals also make verifying claims and counter-claims a major problem.

More than 250 Afghan civilians were killed by Afghan and foreign forces in the first six months of this year, the United Nations says. NATO disputes the figure and says it is much lower.

The Taliban have killed many more civilians, at least 450 so far this year, according to the U.N., and as many as 80 percent of the victims of suicide bombs are innocent bystanders.  Continued...

 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary