FACTBOX - NATO's force in Afghanistan

Mon Mar 31, 2008 11:03am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

(Reuters) - The largest summit in NATO's history starts on Wednesday and could show whether the U.S.-led alliance has the resolve to win the war in Afghanistan.

Here are some key details about NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) in Afghanistan.

ISAF's ROLE:

* ISAF's role is to help Afghan authorities provide a safe environment for reconstruction and the rule of law. It carries out patrols, runs reconstruction projects, trains the Afghan army and police and operates Kabul International Airport.

-- While NATO is not expected to actively hunt and kill insurgents, tougher rules of engagement drawn up for the southern expansion mean its troops may use force to pre-empt enemy threats.

* NATO assumed command and control of the ISAF mission on August 11, 2003.

* The Afghan mission is the alliance's biggest ground operation in its history. The transfer of U.S. troops is the biggest deployment of U.S. forces under foreign command since World War Two.

ISAF BREAKDOWN:

* Here is a breakdown of current national deployments within the 40-nation ISAF, which NATO says now has some 47,000 troops.

UNITED STATES: 15,000 troops (mainly east)

UNITED KINGDOM: 7,800 (mainly south)

GERMANY: 3,210 (north)

ITALY: 2,880 (west and capital Kabul)

CANADA: 2,500 (south)

NETHERLANDS: 1,650 (south)

FRANCE: 1,515 (Kabul)  Continued...

 

Interview:

President Barack Obama answers questions during an interview with Reuters in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, November 9, 2009.  REUTERS/Jim Young
Obama warns of China strains

"If we don't solve some of these problems, then I think both economically and politically it will put enormous strains on the relationship," the president tells Reuters.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary