Iran's hawks winning nuclear policy argument

By Edmund Blair - Analysis

TEHRAN (Reuters) - A change in Iran's top nuclear negotiator indicates President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and those who oppose any compromise in an atomic standoff with the West are winning the policy argument in the Islamic Republic.

Saeed Jalili, a close ally of Ahmadinejad, has replaced Ali Larijani, who had been backing a more pragmatic line in talks aimed at allaying the West's suspicions that Iran is seeking to build atomic bombs, a charge Tehran denies.

It is the latest in a series of changes in top posts that have included reshuffles at the central bank and Oil Ministry, strengthening Ahmadinejad's power base ahead of the parliamentary election in March and presidential polls in 2009.

The president's maneuverings do not, however, give him a free hand to draw up policy in Iran's system of clerical rule, which gives Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei the last word in all matters of state, including nuclear policy.

But Khamenei would have approved Jalili's appointment, Iranian analysts say, signalling he backs Ahmadinejad's line that compromise with the West in the past has failed and that the United States is too bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan to open a new military front against Iran.

Although Washington insists it wants diplomacy to end the row, it has refused to rule out military action if that fails.

"There are two analyses (in Iran) about the future of the nuclear crisis. One analysis focuses on gaining advantages through negotiations," said Tehran University professor Hamidreza Jalaiepour.

"The other analysis is that the Western countries do not have enough power to prevent Iran progressing, so they are not afraid of anything. This analysis has the greater voice. Ahmadinejad believes this," he added.