British views on Iraq ignored by U.S.: UK minister

Wed May 2, 2007 6:20am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

LONDON (Reuters) - Britain disagreed with the United States on major issues to do with Iraq but its opinion was ignored at the highest level, Britain's former defense minister said in an interview published on Wednesday.

Geoff Hoon, now Britain's minister for Europe, said top ministers disapproved of the U.S. decision in May 2003 to disband the Iraqi army and rid the Iraqi civil service of members of Saddam Hussein's Baath party but were rebuffed.

He said it felt at times as if the U.S. vice president, Dick Cheney, was making the final decision on key issues, even after Prime Minister Tony Blair had made his point to President George W. Bush and other British ministers had also spoken out.

"Sometimes... Tony had made his point with the president, and I'd made my point with Don (Rumsfeld) and Jack (Straw) had made his point with Colin (Powell) and the decision actually came out of a completely different place.

"And you think: what did we miss? I think we missed Cheney," Hoon told the Guardian newspaper in an interview.

"We certainly argued against (the U.S. administration)."

Hoon said he had argued with the former U.S. defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, over the disbanding of Iraq's 350,000-strong army, a decision that contributed to the insurgency by putting armed and angry men out of work.

The purging of Baath party members from government offices also exacerbated problems in administering Iraq after the invasion and was a decision Britain did not support, he said.

Hoon, who served as defense minister from 1999 until 2005, also said post-war planning in Iraq had been inadequate, and Britain and the United States misread how Iraqis would react to the overthrow of Saddam.

 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
America’s perennial Vietnam syndrome

History does not repeat itself, but the wartime struggles of President Obama in 2009 and President Johnson in 1963 are striking in their similarities. Does the ghost of Vietnam still hang over the White House?  Commentary