Traders puzzle over SocGen fraud explanation

Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:15pm EST
 
Email | Print | | Reprints | Single Page
[-] Text [+]

By Tom Miles

HONG KONG (Reuters) - Incredulous equity traders said on Monday they wanted a better explanation from Societe Generale for how a single rogue trader managed to build up a $73 billion position and cause the French bank to lose $7 billion.

"I think most people are just astonished that someone could get away with that kind of trade for so long without being noticed," said Matt McKeith, head of equity dealing at First State Investments in Hong Kong. "I'd always be slightly suspicious of the company line in these circumstances."

Societe Generale said the trader, 31-year-old Jerome Kerviel, created fictitious accounts to make it look as though his positions had been covered, when in fact they remained unhedged, and falsified documents to justify his actions.

Equity traders were foxed by the explanation, especially since the relatively lowly Kerviel appeared to make no personal profit from his gamble, and were flummoxed as to his motives.

McKeith speculated Kerviel could have had a grudge against the bank which made him want to cause losses or perhaps to show off by making a huge profit under his bosses' noses.

"Or he could have been the fall guy for something systematic in the bank. I think more is going to come out. Perhaps he's been hung out to dry. Perhaps they were legitimate positions."

A trader at a foreign bank in Seoul, who was not authorized to speak to the media about the matter, agreed.

"It's just mysterious. It's unbelievable that this could happen and I want to know how. Even a very small deal cannot go undetected for more than two days if it was not reconciled. It's not a matter of one trader's methods," said the trader.  Continued...

 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

Photo

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  View Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

Photo
Bearing Witness
Reuters award-winning multimedia piece, reflecting five years of reporting the war in Iraq.