U.N. sanctions may hurt but they won't stop Iran

Tue Mar 4, 2008 4:56pm EST
 
[-] Text [+]

By Louis Charbonneau - Analysis

UNITED NATIONS (Reuters) - The U.N. Security Council's decision to impose more sanctions on Iran will make life a little more unpleasant for thousands of Iranians but will not deter Tehran from pursuing its nuclear program, Western analysts said.

The sanctions in themselves -- an increase in the number of individuals and firms on a U.N. travel and asset-freeze blacklist, or calls for vigilance over Iranian banks and shipping firms -- will not do much damage.

The analysts said though they might appear weak, even symbolic, they sent a message to Tehran that even staunch trading partners like Russia and China opposed Tehran's determination to defy the Security Council and continue to enrich uranium.

Russia's Foreign Ministry made this clear on Tuesday, calling the third sanctions resolution against Iran "a serious political signal about the need to cooperate with the U.N. Security Council" to dispel fears it wants nuclear weapons.

Pierre Goldschmidt, former deputy director of the U.N. nuclear watchdog who investigated Iran's atomic program for years, told Reuters the sanctions would not change Tehran.

"I don't think the new sanctions will improve Iran's attitude with regard to its nuclear program or compliance with UNSC (U.N. Security Council) resolutions," said Goldschmidt.

But it told "Iran that the international community cannot accept Iran's non-compliance," he said.

Iran ignored three previous Security Council resolutions demanding that it halt its uranium enrichment program, which can produce fuel for nuclear weapons or atomic bombs. Tehran, which insists its nuclear program is peaceful, said it had no intention to comply with the latest "illegal" resolution.

George Perkovich, vice president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace think-tank, said Iran's leaders were "rational" and probably deterrable though the right formula for persuading them to halt enrichment had yet to be found.

Military force was not a viable option and would do more harm than good, he added.

IMPACT OF SANCTIONS

Tehran's U.N. Ambassador Mohammad Khazaee told reporters last week the sanctions had a negative impact but also made Iran more determined to press ahead with its nuclear program.

Sami Alfaraj, president of the Kuwait Centre for Strategic Studies, said sanctions were hurting some 10,000 small Iranian businesses and their hundreds of thousands of employees. This, he said, could influence election results.

"I'm sure it's going to ... have an impact on the way people think about the management of foreign policy by this current administration of President (Mahmoud) Ahmadinejad."

Some analysts say that stopping the sanctions drive would boost the position of hardliners in the United States and Israel who favor air strikes against Iran's atomic facilities.  Continued...

 
A Taliban fighter poses with weapons in an undisclosed location in Afghanistan October 30, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer
Taliban may wait out Washington's "endgame"

Washington's hint of an Afghanistan endgame in saying U.S. troops won't still be there in 2017 might help win over a war-weary public, but there is no guarantee a notoriously patient Taliban won't just wait the Americans out.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A paradox of plenty: Hunger in America

In the world’s wealthiest country, home to more obese people than anywhere else on earth, one in six Americans struggled to feed themselves and their children in 2008. Millions went hungry, at least some of the time. Things are bound to get worse.  Commentary