Gains in Iraq's Anbar permanent: U.S. general

Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:25pm EST
 
[-] Text [+]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Security gains in Iraq's once-restive Anbar province are permanent but Iraqi forces need another year and a half before they can operate there without American help, a U.S. general said on Monday.

Marine Corps Maj. Gen. Walter Gaskin, the commander of U.S. forces in the western desert region, said local tribes who turned against al Qaeda in Iraq militants to fight alongside U.S. troops would not reverse their decision.

"The positive trends are permanent," he told reporters at the Pentagon by videolink from Iraq. "The Anbaris are tired of violence."

The tribes' decision has been key in turning Anbar from one of the deadliest areas of Iraq into one of the calmest over the past year.

Gaskin said the weekly number of attacks on U.S. and Iraqi forces had declined from 460 a year ago to 40 last week.

Although both al Qaeda in Iraq and the Anbar tribes are Sunni Muslims, the militants alienated local people with a harsh interpretation of Islam and poor treatment of tribal leaders, Gaskin said.

"They have created a schism that I don't think will ever be repaired," he said. Gaskin said the two groups were involved in blood feuds that could take generations to resolve.

He said the local population was providing plenty of volunteers for the security forces but it would take time for them to develop.

"They have to be trained, they have to gain experience," he said. "By 19 months, I see them rising to the level ... which is required for them to operate independently."

(Reporting by Andrew Gray, editing by Richard Meares)

 
Photo
Home of the low rollers

Casinos love high rollers who spend big money looking for a good time, late nights and a lot of fun. But Laughlin, Nevada sure ain’t Vegas, Toto.  Blog | Full Coverage 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary