FACTBOX: Presidential candidates on Iraq withdrawal

Thu Apr 10, 2008 1:02pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

(Reuters) - Both Democrats running for U.S. president have promised to pull troops from Iraq, but some analysts and defense officials question whether either would fulfill that pledge if elected. Here are some statements from the candidates about withdrawal.

* Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton has said the United States could start withdrawing troops within 60 days of her taking office next January and that it was up to the Iraqis to take responsibility for their country's future.

"We cannot win their civil war. There is no military solution," Clinton has said.

* Democratic candidate Barack Obama has promised that if elected he would immediately begin withdrawing troops in a process that could last 16 months, leaving only forces to guard the U.S. Embassy and "a counterterrorism force to strike al Qaeda if it forms a base that the Iraqis cannot destroy."

He has criticized Republican candidate John McCain for not defining success in Iraq. "For him to argue that -- which he has repeatedly -- that any suggestion that we withdraw troops is surrender, that implies that, you know, we will be there as long as he thinks it's necessary for us to be there."

* McCain has said U.S. troops should remain in Iraq for many years but that progress in the war would mean the United States could stand down from a combat posture "in a relatively short period of time."

He has said a premature troop withdrawal would dramatically enhance Iranian influence in the region.

"If we pull out of Iraq ... then obviously the Iranian influence is dramatically increased, al Qaeda has greater influence and endangers the region dramatically, and the United States' image and security challenges are dramatically increased," he has said.

(Compiled by Donna Smith and Kristin Roberts; Editing by David Alexander and David Wiessler)

 
A Taliban fighter poses with weapons in an undisclosed location in Afghanistan October 30, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer
Taliban may wait out Washington's "endgame"

Washington's hint of an Afghanistan endgame in saying U.S. troops won't still be there in 2017 might help win over a war-weary public, but there is no guarantee a notoriously patient Taliban won't just wait the Americans out.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A paradox of plenty: Hunger in America

In the world’s wealthiest country, home to more obese people than anywhere else on earth, one in six Americans struggled to feed themselves and their children in 2008. Millions went hungry, at least some of the time. Things are bound to get worse.  Commentary