White House renews veto threat on housing bill

Fri Jul 11, 2008 7:45pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. President George W. Bush would veto Senate housing legislation if it includes $4 billion in block grants to states to buy foreclosed homes, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino said on Friday.

After weeks of wrangling and growing concerns about wobbly housing markets, the U.S. Senate passed a plan to save hundreds of thousands of American homeowners and their families from foreclosure and sent it to the House of Representatives.

The Senate measure also overhaul regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the nation's largest mortgage finance companies, which have come under tremendous pressure in the last few days amid concerns about reserves.

"The Senate bill would provide for $4 billion in block grants to states to purchase already foreclosed homes, which just helps lenders who now own these properties, not people trying to stay in their homes," Perino said in a statement.

"If this provision is in legislation that comes to the president's desk, he will veto it," she said.

The White House also opposes a Senate provision that would ban risk-based pricing for Federal Housing Administration loan insurance.

Perino praised the Senate bill for strengthening oversight and regulation of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, providing "a strong regulator that will ensure that the housing GSEs hold sufficient capital and are focused on their statutory housing mission."

"The Senate GSE oversight provisions must not be weakened," she said.

Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac shares have dropped sharply this week as investors fret over the whether the two government- sponsored enterprises have the reserves needed to survive sinking home values and soaring defaults.

(Reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky; Editing by Andre Grenon)

 
Photo

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary