Elitism charge hurts in U.S. politics

Wed Apr 16, 2008 9:47am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Matthew Bigg - Analysis

ATLANTA (Reuters) - In a country that loves to see itself as a land of opportunity, Americans may expect their presidential candidates to be richer and more educated than the average.

But they don't want them to talk down to voters. That is what Democratic candidate Barack Obama appeared to do when he spoke last week about Americans in blighted small towns who "cling to guns or religion" as an outlet for their frustrations.

Candidates seen as having too much education, too much money or an aristocratic background are liable to be dubbed elitist if they do or say something that seems to show a lack of understanding of ordinary Americans, commentators said.

The Democratic nominee in 2004, John Kerry, was mocked as an elitist when he was photographed windsurfing. President George H. W. Bush's re-election bid in 1992 suffered when he appeared baffled at the sight of a grocery scanner.

The problem for politicians seems to be less the elitism, than the perception of it and the negative associations around the concept have deep roots in U.S. culture.

"It goes back to King George III and why we came here. We came here to get away from the elitism and the whole style and culture of a class society of Britain. That's the roots of it," presidential historian Lee Edwards told Reuters.

"But if you look at the record you will see that we have been comfortable with aristocratic looking and sounding presidents."

Recent presidents including George W. Bush, his father and even Ronald Reagan, a movie star, could be described as members of an elite, Edwards said.

Obama leads a close race against Hillary Clinton for the Democratic nomination to run against Republican candidate John McCain in November's election.

But he was quickly tagged out of touch by Clinton and McCain after he told an audience in San Francisco last week that voters from small towns in Pennsylvania were bitter and clung to guns and God because they faced economic hardship.

In fact, Obama appeared at ease with voters during a recent bus tour of the state, chatting about basketball with men in sports bars and other small venues. His campaign has tried to turn this week's problem on its head by using an evergreen anti-Washington retort.

"When I hear my opponents, both of whom have spent decades in Washington, saying I'm out of touch, it's time to cut through their rhetoric and look at the reality," Obama told an audience in Pittsburgh on Monday.

AUTHENTICITY

Even so, few doubt he will have been hurt by the remarks among white, blue-collar workers who dominate parts of Pennsylvania, which is due to hold a primary election next Tuesday. Obama was never favored to win the state.

"It is going to be very difficult for him to win Pennsylvania with that statement," said Terry Madonna, professor of public affairs at Pennsylvania's Franklin and Marshall College.  Continued...

 
A Taliban fighter poses with weapons in an undisclosed location in Afghanistan October 30, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer
Taliban may wait out Washington's "endgame"

Washington's hint of an Afghanistan endgame in saying U.S. troops won't still be there in 2017 might help win over a war-weary public, but there is no guarantee a notoriously patient Taliban won't just wait the Americans out.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Photo

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A paradox of plenty: Hunger in America

In the world’s wealthiest country, home to more obese people than anywhere else on earth, one in six Americans struggled to feed themselves and their children in 2008. Millions went hungry, at least some of the time. Things are bound to get worse.  Commentary