FACTBOX: Congress under attack for "earmark" money

Mon Jan 28, 2008 3:41pm EST
 
[-] Text [+]

(Reuters) - "Earmark" has become a dirty word in Washington, but for decades these spending measures have been the bread-and-butter of U.S. lawmaking for Democrats and Republicans alike.

In his State of the Union speech on Monday, President George W. Bush is calling for a reduction in the measures targeted to lawmakers' home states or congressional districts that find their way into annual appropriations bills passed by Congress.

Following is a description of earmarks, along with some examples:

* To supporters, an earmark is a way for members of Congress to get funding for a specific hometown project, such as a new bridge, a university research grant or weapons system production that will bring jobs to a congressional district.

* To critics, an earmark is nothing more than government waste -- sometimes corrupt, sometimes frivolous -- that gets inserted into annual appropriations bills by members of the House of Representatives or Senate, usually without congressional hearings or other oversight.

* For all of the controversy, earmarks represent a small portion of U.S. government spending, less than 1 percent of the federal budget.

* Two years ago, in fiscal 2006, earmarks were estimated to have grown to more than $16 billion, not counting some major projects run by the Army Corp of Engineers and Pentagon. In fiscal 2007, the new Democratic-run Congress put a moratorium on earmarks pending a review of procedures. This year, they total just over $9 billion, according to the House Appropriations Committee. Defense spending bills attract more earmarks than any of the other 11 individual spending bills.

* Democrats in Congress accuse the Bush administration of using its own form of earmarks with no-bid contracts and in other day-to-day decisions by agencies on how project money is spent.

* Earmarks gained attention after it was disclosed that former Rep. Randy "Duke" Cunningham, a California Republican, used his position on the House Appropriations Committee to funnel millions of dollars to a defense contractor by using them. Cunningham pleaded guilty to bribery in 2005.

* Some notable recent earmarks: Funds for the "bridge to nowhere" in Alaska to connect Ketchikan to a small island airport that already had ferry service; money to help build a Woodstock Museum in New York to memorialize the 1969 rock concert; funding for a teapot museum in Sparta, North Carolina. An earmark also established the Iraq Study Group to examine ways out of the war.

* Under congressional reforms, sponsors of earmarks now must be identified, along with other details on who would get the money.

(Reporting by Richard Cowan, editing by Vicki Allen)

 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video

Analysis

A woman and a child wear masks as they wait for a H1N1 flu check-up at a temporary H1N1 flu treatment centre at a hospital in Seoul November 3, 2009.   REUTERS/Choi Bu-Seok
Swine flu skepticism demands deft response

European scientists and health authorities are facing angry questions about why H1N1 flu has not caused death and destruction on the scale first feared, and they need to respond deftly to ensure public support.  Full Article | Full Coverage