FACTBOX-U.S. Supreme Court case on Guantanamo prison
(Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments on Wednesday in a major case to decide the legal rights of terror suspects held in the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Following are some facts about the case.
* The Guantanamo prison opened in January 2002 to house prisoners swept up in the U.S.-led invasion of Afghanistan and elsewhere. About 305 detainees are in the camp, according to the Defense Department, and about 470 have been released.
Among the 14 designated "high-value" detainees are suspected September 11 attack organizer Khalid Sheikh Mohammed.
* The court will consider the constitutionality of the 2006 Military Commissions Act denying Guantanamo inmates "habeas corpus" rights to seek a judicial review of their detention.
* Some inmates, human-rights groups and federal law-enforcement officials have described abusive interrogation and treatment at the prison. The Defense Department says it treats the inmates humanely, while collecting intelligence in the battle against terrorism.
* Among those who have filed briefs with the Supreme Court on the side of Guantanamo inmates are the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights, a group of retired U.S. military officers, a group of former federal judges, the American Bar Association, European and British parliament members, Amnesty International and Republican U.S. Sen. Arlen Specter.
* Groups supporting the government's position with briefs include retired U.S. generals and admirals, the Committee on the Present Danger and the American Center for Law and Justice.
* The Supreme Court has twice previously ruled against the government's procedures for holding or trying detainees at Guantanamo. A federal appeals court upheld the 2006 law, but in a highly unusual move, a majority of Supreme Court justices voted to take the case after earlier rejecting a petition to hear it.
(Reporting by Randall Mikkelsen; Editing by David Alexander and Todd Eastham)
© Thomson Reuters 2009 All rights reserved
Taliban may wait out Washington's "endgame"
Washington's hint of an Afghanistan endgame in saying U.S. troops won't still be there in 2017 might help win over a war-weary public, but there is no guarantee a notoriously patient Taliban won't just wait the Americans out. Full Article | Full Coverage




