Fed to clarify emergency loan power to key senator

Fri Dec 5, 2008 10:44am EST
 
[-] Text [+]

By Mark Felsenthal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Federal Reserve is expected to send a letter to a key lawmaker on Friday explaining that it must obtain sufficient collateral under law to make any emergency loans, a source familiar with the letter said on Thursday.

The letter is a response to a request from Democrat Christopher Dodd, chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, who sought clarification of the Fed's powers under a clause of the Federal Reserve Act that the U.S. central bank has repeatedly invoked this year to provide emergency funding to a range of financial institutions buffeted by the financial crisis.

The possibility of Fed loans to U.S. carmakers arose during a committee hearing earlier on Thursday about Detroit's request for $34 billion in federal aid.

Lawmakers at the hearing asked why the Fed could not loan money to help General Motors and Chrysler , which have said they urgently need a cash infusion. Ford Motor is asking for a line of credit from the federal government.

The Fed has provided hundreds of billions of dollars to banks and other financial institutions against a wide range of collateral including U.S. Treasury securities and debt securities issued by mortgage finance enterprises.

Unlike those financial institutions, it appears unlikely that U.S. automakers would be able to post enough collateral.

 

Interview:

President Barack Obama answers questions during an interview with Reuters in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, November 9, 2009.  REUTERS/Jim Young
Obama warns of China strains

"If we don't solve some of these problems, then I think both economically and politically it will put enormous strains on the relationship," the president tells Reuters.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary