U.S.-Russia nuclear deal: spin or deep cut?

Mon Jul 6, 2009 2:37pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Guy Faulconbridge - Analysis

MOSCOW (Reuters) - President Barack Obama and Russian leader Dmitry Medvedev on Monday agreed a target of cutting vast Cold War arsenals of deployed nuclear warheads by around a third from current levels to 1,500-1,675 each.

The pledge by Obama and Medvedev puts the world's two biggest nuclear powers further along the path to finding a replacement for the landmark 1991 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START-1) which expires on December 5.

But the cuts announced on Monday only take the United States and Russia 25 operationally deployed warheads below a range of 1,700-2,200, which both sides had already committed to reach by 2012 under the 2002 Moscow Treaty.

After the cuts -- which have to be made within seven years of a new treaty taking force -- the United States and Russia will still have enough firepower to destroy the world several times over. Many hurdles remain to finding a replacement to START by December.

Russia and the United States are still haggling over what exactly constitutes a nuclear weapon and the Kremlin is deeply opposed to U.S. plans for a missile defense system in Europe.

NUCLEAR CUTS

Finding agreement on a replacement for START-1, signed by George Bush and Mikhail Gorbachev just months before the close of the Cold War, is seen by both sides as a way to "reset" relations after the friction of recent years.

Presidents Obama and Medvedev agreed at their first meeting in London on April 1 to pursue new reductions to strategic nuclear weapons and instructed negotiators to begin talks on a replacement for START-1.

This was already a step forward because Obama's predecessor George W. Bush showed little interest in a successor treaty to START-1, arguing that it was not necessary. Obama, however, has made nuclear disarmament a priority.

The cuts announced on Monday came after negotiators worked through the weekend to get a deal for the presidents to sign, diplomats said.

"It's better to be talking than fighting but there's a lot of talking to go," said John Isaacs, executive director of the Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation in Washington.

"The basic flavor is they've made some progress but not many concrete results. President Bush messed up a lot of things but it will take more than eight months to fix," he said.

"It will take a while to get to the really deep cuts in warheads and it will take another agreement after this one."

Officials say an agreement on a START treaty that slashed nuclear weapons would help Washington and Moscow to set an example to other countries ahead of talks next year on revising the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

But Russia and the United States still currently hold 95 percent of the world's nuclear warheads.  Continued...

 
Photo
Home of the low rollers

Casinos love high rollers who spend big money looking for a good time, late nights and a lot of fun. But Laughlin, Nevada sure ain’t Vegas, Toto.  Blog | Full Coverage 

More News

Russia sees U.S. space threat, builds new rocket
Tuesday, 11 Aug 2009 06:27am EDT 
Obama agrees arms cuts, Afghan transit with Russia
Monday, 6 Jul 2009 04:41pm EDT 
FACTBOX: Main deals at Obama-Medvedev summit
Monday, 6 Jul 2009 02:40pm EDT 
Obama-Medvedev summit in Russia
Monday, 6 Jul 2009 01:58pm EDT 
INSTANT VIEW: Reaction to U.S.-Russia summit
Monday, 6 Jul 2009 12:51pm EDT 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A good war gone bad

In the protracted Washington debate over the war in Afghanistan, the most concise analysis comes from America's top soldier: "If we don't get a level of legitimacy and governance (there), then all the troops in the world aren't going to make any difference."  Commentary