Pakistan, seen stalling, says wants nukes banned

Wed Aug 12, 2009 2:50pm EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Robert Evans

GENEVA (Reuters) - Pakistan, accused by some powers of blocking progress in the world's top disarmament forum, insisted Wednesday that it wants an end to nuclear weaponry and is playing an active role to bring this about.

But in a statement issued in Islamabad, it argued that "the legitimate security interests of all states" had to be protected in any move toward new talks in the long-stalled Conference on Disarmament, under U.N. auspices, in Geneva.

Pakistan "subscribes to the goals of nuclear disarmament and non-proliferation... and has always played an active and constructive role in the Conference," the Pakistan Online News Service (www.pakistanviews.worldpress.com) cited a foreign ministry spokesman as saying.

Like its neighbor and rival India, Pakistan conducted nuclear tests in 1998 even though it is not one of the official nuclear powers, and diplomats believe its maneuvers at the disarmament conference aim to preserve its nuclear status. Pakistan has not signed Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

Scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, the father of Pakistan's nuclear program, is widely regarded as a national hero even though he played a key role in the transfer of nuclear technology to rogue states.

The Pakistani statement came as China's Foreign Minister Yang Jiechi was calling at the forum in Geneva for a quick start to talks on a treaty to halt production of the fissile material -- enriched uranium and plutonium -- used to make nuclear weapons.

Yang made no direct reference to Pakistan, but his comments appeared at least partly aimed at Beijing's Asian ally which the 27-nation European Union, backed less vocally by others in the 65-member conference, says is blocking such talks.

A so-called fissile cut-off agreement is widely regarded as the next achievable step toward ending the threat of nuclear war and a recent breakthrough had appeared to clear the way for negotiations to begin in the next few months.

DEADLOCK, BREAKTHROUGH, CONSENSUS

At the end of May, after 12 years of haggling that paralyzed its work, the forum agreed by consensus that it would set the talks on track within an overall work program by the end of its current session on September 18.

But Monday current conference president Caroline Millar of Australia said detailed backstage discussions over the past few weeks on how to proceed had got nowhere and Pakistan was seeking to reopen the consensus text.

Sweden, current holder of the EU's revolving presidency, suggested Pakistan -- a nuclear power in a long stand-off with neighbor India -- was using "procedural maneuvers" to ensure that no real agreement on cutting weaponry could be reached.

British envoy John Duncan said Pakistan's stand was disappointing as the five permanent members of the U.N. Security Council -- the United States, Russia, China, France and Britain -- as well as Iran, North Korea and Israel, back the consensus.

Pakistan's envoy made no comment after Yang's speech on Wednesday and the conference adjourned with no date set for its next full session.

But diplomats said Wednesday's statement in Islamabad, which argued that Pakistan was not violating the May consensus, indicated that it had no intention at this stage of giving ground to pressure from other countries.  Continued...

 
Photo

More News

Mumbai attack justice high priority for Obama: diplomat
Wednesday, 12 Aug 2009 03:46pm EDT 
Make breaking, leaving nuke treaty harder: U.S.
Wednesday, 12 Aug 2009 03:25pm EDT 
North Korea looks at new deal of its nuclear cards
Wednesday, 12 Aug 2009 10:40am EDT 
China urges diplomacy in Iran, North Korea nuke rows
Wednesday, 12 Aug 2009 07:35am EDT 
FACTBOX: A look at North Korea's nuclear arms program
Wednesday, 12 Aug 2009 04:43am EDT 

Featured Broker sponsored link

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A paradox of plenty: Hunger in America

In the world’s wealthiest country, home to more obese people than anywhere else on earth, one in six Americans struggled to feed themselves and their children in 2008. Millions went hungry, at least some of the time. Things are bound to get worse.  Commentary