Poor urge deep climate cuts

Wed Nov 4, 2009 1:52pm EST
 
[-] Text [+]

By Alister Doyle and Gerard Wynn

BARCELONA, Spain (Reuters) - Developing countries said on Wednesday they risked "total destruction" unless the rich stepped up the fight against climate change to a level that even the United Nations says is out of reach.

The top U.S. climate diplomat Todd Stern blamed a "17-year divide" between rich and poor nations for slow progress at the U.N. talks meant to agree a global climate deal in Copenhagen in December, and slammed "debating society" pranks.

Keeping up pressure in Barcelona, the final preparatory session for the December meeting, the poor said that even the most ambitious offers by the European Union, tougher than most nations, were far too weak for a new U.N. climate pact.

"The result of that is to condemn developing countries to a total destruction of their livelihoods, their economies. Their land, their forests will all be destroyed. And for what purpose?" said Lumumba Stanislaus Di-Aping of Sudan, chair of the Group of 77 and China, representing poor nations.

"Anything south of 40 (percent) means that Africa's population, Africa's land mass is offered destruction," he told a news conference.

Developing countries at the Barcelona talks insisted that rich nations should cut greenhouse gas emissions by at least 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2020 -- far more than on offer.

But even the United Nations said that would involve too wrenching a shift. African nations resumed negotiations in Barcelona on Tuesday after a one-day partial boycott following agreement on more focus on cuts by the rich.

"I think to get to minus 40 is too heavy a lift," Yvo de Boer, head of the U.N. Climate Change Secretariat, told Reuters. Such a shift would require "going back to the drawing board" and would economically "come at a huge cost," he said.

DIVIDE

In Washington, the top U.S. diplomat on climate change, Todd Stern, criticized entrenched positions in talks since the world agreed the U.N. climate convention in 1992 in Rio de Janeiro.

"The divide between developed and developing countries that has run down the center of climate change discussions for the past 17 years is still alive and well," he told a panel in the U.S. House of Representatives.

"We are not engaged right now in a debating society," he said of the international talks.

So far, developed nations are planning cuts averaging between 11 and 15 percent by 2020 from 1990 levels to slow climate change that could lead to more droughts, floods, rising sea levels, more powerful cyclones and a spread of disease.

Sudan's Di-Aping said "in real and absolute terms (the effort) is minimal." He said rich nations spent billions of dollars on solving the financial crisis or on defense.

Cuts of 40 percent as demanded by African nations "would be extremely difficult," said Anders Turesson, head of the Swedish delegation which holds the European Union's rotating presidency.  Continued...

 
A Taliban fighter poses with weapons in an undisclosed location in Afghanistan October 30, 2009. REUTERS/Stringer
Taliban may wait out Washington's "endgame"

Washington's hint of an Afghanistan endgame in saying U.S. troops won't still be there in 2017 might help win over a war-weary public, but there is no guarantee a notoriously patient Taliban won't just wait the Americans out.  Full Article | Full Coverage 

Photo

More News

Senate panel tries to advance climate bill
Tuesday, 3 Nov 2009 06:28pm EST 
African nations end boycott of U.N. climate talks
Tuesday, 3 Nov 2009 12:55pm EST 
Full climate deal unlikely by Copenhagen: Barroso
Tuesday, 3 Nov 2009 12:49pm EST 
Ban Ki-moon says detailed climate deal unlikely
Tuesday, 3 Nov 2009 10:23am EST 
China urged to adopt tougher C02 target
Tuesday, 3 Nov 2009 09:45am EST 

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.  Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Bernd Debusmann
A paradox of plenty: Hunger in America

In the world’s wealthiest country, home to more obese people than anywhere else on earth, one in six Americans struggled to feed themselves and their children in 2008. Millions went hungry, at least some of the time. Things are bound to get worse.  Commentary