ST. LOUIS (Reuters) - Even as a shift in U.S. prosecution policy gives states more leeway to legalize marijuana, the companies that dispense it are likely to have trouble finding a bank, financial service industry and enforcement experts said.
Federal anti-money laundering rules prohibit the handling of proceeds from illegal activities, and banks must follow strict monitoring and reporting procedures to stay within the law. Because a federal prohibition of marijuana is still in place, most banks do not work with marijuana businesses in states that have legalized medical or recreational use of the drug.
"There are simply too many unanswered questions at this time," said Jimmy Gurule, a former enforcement official at the U.S. Treasury Department. "I don't think that the banks will run the risk of criminal prosecution."
Banks are not mentioned in last week's four-page memo in which the U.S. Justice Department outlined the policy shift to prosecutors. This suggests that the Obama administration still is not prepared to allow money from state-recognized pot sales to flow into banks and other financial institutions.
"The Justice Department could have gone the next step and at least applied its new standards to financial transactions that derive from medical marijuana proceeds," said Peter Djinis, a former regulatory policy official with Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
"Either Justice officials were not aware of this dilemma, which is hard to believe, or they didn't want to enter into that fray," Djinis said.
A Justice Department spokesman did not respond to a request for comment. FinCEN spokesman Steve Hudak said only that the agency was "reviewing the latest developments."
The Justice Department memo reiterated its commitment to enforcing federal restrictions on marijuana. But it told prosecutors to focus on areas of federal interest, such as distribution to minors, involvement of organized crime, trafficking across state lines and growing on public land. In other cases, enforcement would be a state matter.
Banks handling money from state-authorized marijuana dispensaries may face a money-laundering prosecution by either the federal government or by another state if the funds cross state lines, said Gurule, who is now a professor at the University of Notre Dame law school.
Shunned by banks, dispensaries have flocked to money-services businesses to obtain money orders. But that industry is not well prepared to manage the legal obligations, Djinis said.
"This new policy (by the Justice Department) doesn't solve the problem at all for the financial services community," he said. "If anything, it makes it more cumbersome, more confusing and less satisfying."
For instance, he said, dispensaries that distribute to minors will still face prosecution. But a financial institution would have no way of knowing whether a client had engaged in that or another activity still targeted by federal enforcers.
The medical marijuana business was worth $1.7 billion in 2011 and is growing, according to a study by financial analysis firm See Change Strategy.
Roughly 20 states and the District of Columbia have legalized medical marijuana. Voters in Colorado and Washington state went a step further in November by legalizing recreational use.
But the U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration and the Justice Department probably "will continue to maintain that the proceeds are still illicit," said a former Justice Department official who requested anonymity.
"I don't think the big banks will change their present policy and bank these outfits," he said. "It's not worth the risk."
Even if the Justice Department said financial institutions could serve state-authorized marijuana dispensaries, a regulator or a "rogue" U.S. attorney might have a different view and go after a bank, said Rob Rowe, a lawyer with the American Bankers Association's Center for Legal and Regulatory Compliance.
Some association members have said marijuana should remain illegal, he said, while others see "a viable small business opportunity" to offer banking services.
"But until Congress changes the law," Rowe said, "there is not a lot a bank can do."
(This article was produced by the Compliance Complete service of Thomson Reuters Accelus (accelus.thomsonreuters.com). Compliance Complete (here) provides regulatory news, analysis, rules and developments, with global coverage of more than 400 regulators and exchanges.)
Editing by Randall Mikkelsen and Lisa Von Ahn