LONDON (Reuters) - BP Plc (BP.L) has supported aspects of a proposal made by Royal Dutch Shell (RDSa.L) over reforming the benchmark price assessment for Brent crude, rather than those of pricing agency Platts.
Oil companies and Platts want to boost the credibility of Brent, a benchmark for oil trade. Critics say cash Brent is prone to manipulation because it is based on dwindling supplies of four North Sea crudes, sometimes leading to higher prices.
Shell and Platts put forward differing proposals last month, and the prospect of two standards led to concerns about a split in liquidity in the Brent-Forties-Oseberg-Ekofisk (BFOE) forward market, which could damage the benchmark’s credibility.
The cheapest of the four BFOE crudes - usually Forties because it is of lower quality - sets the value of dated Brent, the benchmark used to price cargoes in Europe, the Middle East, Africa and parts of Asia.
In a March 6 letter to Platts made available by BP, BP responded to the Platts’ proposal to apply quality premiums to two of the crudes deliverable into BFOE forward contracts that help establish the Brent price.
BP said it still supported Shell’s suggestion over the timeframe used to calculate quality premiums and disagreed with Platts’ proposal not to apply a premium if price differences between crude grades were less than 50 cents a barrel.
“For these reasons we are not able to support your modifications to Shell’s proposal and would urge you to reconsider your position in this regard,” BP’s letter said with respect to those two points.
BP also supported Shell’s proposal on the size of the quality premium applied to Oseberg crude - 25 percent rather than the 50 percent proposed by Platts - although adding that its concern was less than over the first two issues.
Oil traders say the introduction of quality premiums would encourage traders to deliver the full range of eligible crudes into the BFOE contracts, increasing liquidity. At present, Forties most often tends to be delivered.
Platts, a unit of McGraw-Hill MHP.N which provides clients with price benchmarks in the energy markets, is seeking input on its proposal until March 10.
Trade sources expect the industry to settle on a single standard.
“BP and Shell have made some statements, but they seem to be looking for concessions from Platts,” a senior trader said. “I guess it is really now Platts’ turn to comment.”
BP said it agreed to implement changes for cargoes loading in June 2013 as proposed by Platts, a month later than Shell originally suggested.
Reporting by Alex Lawler; editing by Jane Baird