Reuters logo
MTV stands by "Skins" as ratings stabilize
February 2, 2011 / 5:17 AM / in 7 years

MTV stands by "Skins" as ratings stabilize

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV’s hot-button drama “Skins” lost its ninth advertiser Tuesday. But the network said MTV has “not lost any advertising dollars” and maintained that the controversy has actually been good for the show.

“I think it’s always good when people are talking about you and people are certainly talking about (Skins),” programing chief David Janollari told the Hollywood Reporter.

“Skins” -- the centerpiece of a new scripted initiative at MTV -- has attracted the ire of watchdog groups for numerous portrayals of teen sex, drinking and drug use. The Parents Television Council has been relentless in targeting the show’s advertisers. Proactiv has become the latest to pull out, following the likes of Schick, H&R Block and General Motors.

“Certainly Skins is a bolder step in the scripted direction for us,” said Janollari. “You’re always going to have haters. And MTV is no stranger to that kind of reaction, most recently with ‘Jersey Shore’ and going all the way back to ‘Jackass.'”

The controversy has also earned the show copious headlines and a spoof on “Saturday Night Live.” And Janollari clearly likes some of the attention.

“It’s always flattering when you’re spoofed by SNL two weeks into your series run,” he said. “That’s great and that really helps.”

The third episode of “Skins” was watched by 1.5 million viewers Monday, down slightly from last week’s 1.6 million, according to Nielsen. Janollari said he was pleased with the ratings so far, although the premiere episode was watched by more than three million viewers thanks to an enormous 7 million-plus lead-in from a new episode of “Jersey Shore.”

“We’re basically trending relatively steady as the audience gets more invested in the characters,” he said, adding that the network is committed to airing all 10 episodes of “Skins” that have been ordered.

Janollari would not directly address the assertion that Skins may have run afoul of federal child pornography statutes by having a 17-year-old actor film a nude scene. But he said that the issues with “Skins” would not affect the network’s scripted initiative.

“The scripted presence on our network is a very important part of our plan,” he said. “And we’re in it for the long run.”

0 : 0
  • narrow-browser-and-phone
  • medium-browser-and-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser
  • wide-browser-and-larger
  • medium-browser-and-landscape-tablet
  • medium-wide-browser-and-larger
  • above-phone
  • portrait-tablet-and-above
  • above-portrait-tablet
  • landscape-tablet-and-above
  • landscape-tablet-and-medium-wide-browser
  • portrait-tablet-and-below
  • landscape-tablet-and-below