WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Giving corporations a tax break on their overseas profits likely would not boost the economy or jobs, said credit rating agency Fitch Inc on Thursday after two senators unveiled a tax “holiday” bill.
The Fitch statement echoed two other studies released on Tuesday that reached the same conclusion -- a stark contrast with the picture painted by Republican Senator John McCain of the legislation he introduced with Democrat Kay Hagan.
The lawmakers appeared at a news conference to discuss their measure, which offers two possible reduced tax rates for repatriating, or bringing into the United States, earnings now stashed abroad avoiding the 35 percent corporate income tax.
Under the bipartisan Hagan-McCain bill, multinationals could repatriate foreign profits at an 8.75 percent tax rate or, if they boost hiring, at 5.25 percent. Corporations are sitting on an estimated $1.5 trillion in overseas profits. (For a Reuters Insider interview with Hagan: r.reuters.com/qem34s)
McCain said his bill would be offered as an amendment to President Barack Obama’s jobs package when that measure arrives in the Senate, if the Democratic Senate leadership does not explicitly include the tax provision in the jobs package.
The Obama administration reiterated its refusal to consider a foreign profit tax break on its own.
Citing past statements on the issue by U.S. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, a Treasury spokeswoman on Wednesday said, “We won’t consider tax relief for repatriated earnings outside the context of broader corporate tax reform.”
The Hagan-McCain bill is seen as having little chance of passage as a stand-alone item, but it could be an important bargaining chip as lawmakers and the administration grapple with deficit reduction, tax reform and job creation.
Though small and mid-sized firms have little stake in the matter, big multinationals keenly desire the overseas income tax break. It could be a valuable carrot for Democrats to dangle in seeking support for closing tax loopholes that would raise new revenues and clean up the tax code, analysts said.
Corporate lobbyists trying to spin the tax break as a form of stimulus took another blow from Fitch on Thursday, however.
“Proposed legislation to provide a temporary tax holiday for U.S. firms repatriating foreign earnings is unlikely, if passed, to support growth-oriented investment by U.S. firms,” said Fitch, a top global credit rater, in a statement.
“Fitch expects most firms benefiting from the proposed repatriation tax relief, notably large multinational companies in the technology and pharmaceutical sectors, to prioritize share repurchases at a time when cash balances are strong and capital spending plans are increasingly uncertain,” it said.
Multinationals have been pushing for months for the tax break, hoping to replay a similar Bush administration holiday.
In 2004-2005, in the first overseas corporate profit repatriation tax holiday, 843 corporations brought home $362 billion in overseas income at a 5.25 percent tax rate. Without the holiday, they would have had to pay 35 percent in tax.
As they are doing now, proponents of the tax break six years ago represented it as a boost to jobs and the economy, but numerous studies have raised doubts about this.
Reports released on Tuesday by two think tanks said the 2004-2005 tax break did little or nothing to boost the economy or create jobs, despite promises that it would, and said that another such tax break would likely have the same outcome, going to bonuses and dividends rather than new investments.
Spanning the ideological spectrum, one of the studies this week came from the left-leaning Institute for Policy Studies; the other from the conservative Heritage Foundation.
The Joint Committee on Taxation, a nonpartisan research arm of Congress, has estimated that another tax holiday like the one in 2004-2005 would boost government revenues at first, but eventually cost taxpayers about $78.7 billion over 10 years.
Hagan-McCain would slap a penalty on corporations that repatriate profits from overseas and then cut payrolls. The penalty would be $75,000 per full-time position eliminated.
The 2004-2005 tax break had similar sanctions, but studies have shown that companies found ways to get around them.
Calling the bill “a critical step forward in the effort to jump-start our economic recovery,” WIN America campaign director Karen Olick said it would cause “upwards of $1 trillion” to be brought into the country by businesses.
WIN America is a coalition of companies -- including high-tech giants Apple Inc, Cisco Systems Inc, Oracle Corp and Microsoft Corp -- that is lobbying Congress for the income tax break.
Similar legislation has already been introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Kevin Brady, a House Republican.
McCain, a former presidential candidate who seldom takes a lead role in business and economic legislation, said his bill would pump between $50 billion and $80 billion of tax revenue into the U.S. Treasury and create 2 million jobs.
To get the extra-low tax rate of 5.25 percent, under the bill, companies would have to increase “qualified payroll” by 10 percent or more. Qualified payroll means all wages paid to employees that are subject to payroll tax, the senators said.
Additional reporting by Rachelle Younglai, editing by Matthew Lewis