* Court bars Twitter even during healthcare case
* Signs warn against phones in lawyers' 'lounge'
* Lawyer gave live updates until he was stopped
By David Ingram
WASHINGTON, March 27 A lawyer discovered how far
the U.S. Supreme Court will go to close itself off from the
public when it hears a case, no matter how many people on
Twitter may be interested.
Casey Mattox went to the court on Tuesday to see historic
arguments over whether to strike down the Obama administration's
His plan was to give live updates and the idea appeared to
work as descriptions from the arguments showed up on the Twitter
feed of the Alliance Defense Fund, a conservative legal group
where Mattox is a senior counsel.
But after finding out about the social networking, the court
marshal's office asked Mattox to stop, citing a policy against
electronic communication, a spokeswoman for the Alliance Defense
Fund said afterward.
Mattox "complied with the marshal's directions when asked to
stop communicating," said the spokeswoman, Katie Blechacz.
Except for the errant tweets, and reports from journalists
who left the proceedings early, the only way to follow the
healthcare case was to wait in the dark until after Tuesday
morning's two hours of arguments.
NO CAMERAS ALLOWED
Cameras are not allowed in the courtroom, and the court
waits until arguments are over to release audio recordings.
Journalists inside have only paper and a pen or pencil.
The rules are an attempt to maintain decorum and limit the
influence of the media on what lawyers and the justices say.
Mattox was not in the 400-seat courtroom but instead was
listening to the arguments as they were piped into a separate
overflow room known as the lawyers' lounge. The room is reserved
for any of the 230,000 lawyers who are active members of the
Supreme Court Bar.
At intervals, Mattox would leave the room and, from a
hallway, send e-mails to an Alliance Defense Fund staff member
who was on the social network Twitter, Blechacz said.
"Justice Sotomayor asks for explanation on the three
seemingly different arguments from Solicitor General. #ObamaCare
#SCOTUS," read one typical tweet by @AllianceDefense at 10:29
a.m. EDT (1429 GMT).
The group initially defended the tweets, telling its
followers that it was "posting twitter updates remotely" from
its headquarters in Arizona, not from the court. By late
Tuesday, it had 4,800 followers.
Its final update quoting the arguments came at 11:14 a.m.,
or about 46 minutes before the arguments ended.
Supreme Court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg said there are two
signs in the lawyers' lounge noting that cellular phones and
other electronic devices are prohibited in the room. Lawyers can
check personal belongings in a separate room.
Still, Blechacz said there was confusion and that Mattox was
unaware of any written rules ahead of time. Mattox was not
available for an interview, she said.
A news release from the organization dated March 26 promoted
the idea ahead of time, saying that Mattox "will be providing
live Twitter updates from the ObamaCare oral arguments."
The Alliance Defense Fund opposes the healthcare law and its
requirement that most people have health insurance. It submitted
a legal brief on the side of the challengers.
Lawyers who dabble in the media have found the audio in the
lawyers' lounge tempting before.
"I live blogged from there once and the court banned it,"
said Thomas Goldstein, a lawyer who founded the popular website
SCOTUSblog. "Now I leave the building."
(Reporting by David Ingram; Editing by Howard Goller; Desking
by Lisa Shumaker)