India's left issues blunt threat over nuclear deal

Thu Sep 13, 2007 5:42am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Kamil Zaheer

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Indian communists said on Thursday they would stop supporting the government if it pursued a nuclear deal with the United States, their most blunt threat in a month-old political crisis that has shaken the coalition.

The comments by Prakash Karat, head of the largest of the four left parties that shore up Prime Minister Manmohan Singh's government, made it more likely that Singh's government would not last its entire five-year term, analysts said.

With Singh unlikely to back down over the nuclear deal, he may have to choose between continuing in power as head of a minority government or calling elections before his term ends in May 2009.

"We won't be there to help this government conclude this agreement," said Prakash Karat, the chief of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) (CPI-M). "That's final."

The communists, who have 60 MPs in the 545-member lower house of parliament, had in the past warned the government of "serious consequences" if it went ahead with the deal, without spelling out what those consequences could be.

The pact -- seen as a sign of booming economic and strategic ties between the two powerful democracies -- allows India to import U.S. nuclear fuel and reactors, despite having tested nuclear weapons and not signing the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The left says the deal undermines India's independent foreign policy and draws New Delhi into a strategic alliance with Washington.

"ELECTIONS INEVITABLE"

In order to get the pact working on the ground, New Delhi needs to conclude India-specific safeguards for its civilian reactors with the International Atomic Energy Agency and also get the backing of the Nuclear Suppliers Group of nations.

Besides, the U.S. Congress also needs to approve it again.

Karat said the government must not go ahead with talks with the IAEA if it wants the communists to continue support.

"Don't go. Wait for some time. Listen to our objections. Examine these objections. Let parliament opine on it," he told a seminar on the deal. "But they have not so far agreed.

"This is not a normal matter of differences between us. The question is, why this determination to go ahead despite the fact that the main parties on which the government depends on for its majority say no."

The government and communists have set up a panel meant to resolve differences over the deal, but Karat's comments show that finding common ground will be extremely difficult.

"Each side is playing its cards in the expectation that the other would not press the matter to the point of an immediate election," political analyst Pran Chopra said.  Continued...

 

Analysis

Afghan President Hamid Karzai speaks during a news conference in Kabul November 3, 2009.  REUTERS/Ahmad Masood
Karzai image in tatters

Just how far Hamid Karzai's reputation has fallen is summed up by a cartoon in the Economist, which shows the newly re-elected Afghan leader seated at a table -- between Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Robert Mugabe.   Full Article 

Photo

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
Shrimps boats are seen at the coastal area of Bayou La Batre, Alabama November 10, 2009.  REUTERS/Carlos Barria
Shrimpers struggle

Fishermen like Steve Patronas struggle to make a living, but high costs, low prices for their catches and competition from countries like Vietnam or China are putting many of them out of business and choking off their way of life.  Blog | Video