World must accept some blame over Kenya: group

Mon Mar 17, 2008 4:04am EDT
 
[-] Text [+]

By Andrew Cawthorne

NAIROBI (Reuters) - World leaders had to accept some blame for the violence that rocked Kenya after a disputed December election, killing more than 1,000 people, the international Human Rights Watch group said on Monday.

"Foreign governments should remember that decades of turning a blind eye to corruption, impunity and mismanagement by Kenya's governments has contributed to the recent crisis," the U.S.-based group said in a report.

The world was shocked at the bloodshed in Kenya, previously seen as a haven of stability on a volatile continent, and many leaders helped pressure President Mwai Kibaki and opposition leader Raila Odinga into a February 28 power-sharing pact.

Human Rights Watch accused police of causing "hundreds" of deaths by using excessive force during the two-month crisis in the East African country, especially in opposition strongholds like the town of Kisumu.

Fleeing children had been shot, the group said in its 88-page report.

Lethal force was used quickly in opposition areas but restraint was shown towards pro-government supporters, it said.

The crisis was Kenya's worst since independence from Britain in 1963 and damaged its reputation as a prosperous trade and tourism hub. Kenya is East Africa's biggest economy.

Human Rights Watch blamed successive post-independence governments for failing to address land and poverty issues at the root of the violence.

"Much of the ethnic-based violence was organized by local leaders, politicians and businessmen from all sides, according to eyewitnesses," it said.

(Editing by Ralph Gowling)

 
Photo

Editor's Choice

A selection of our best photos from the past 24 hours.   Slideshow 

Most Popular on Reuters

  • Articles
  • Video
http://www.reuters.com/resources/r/?m=02&d=20091115&t=2&i=12519748&w=450&r=2009-11-15T111439Z_01_RJO111_RTRIDSP_0_AFGHANISTAN
How to finance the war in Afghanistan?

Despite all the pondering President Obama has given to whether to increase troops, it seems he has given far too little consideration to the overall cost of escalating the war and how it will undercut his ability to fund the ambitious domestic policy agenda he has set out from bank bailouts to health care reform.  Commentary